Delayed Diagnosis of Hypertension in Diabetic Patients Monitored in Primary Care

被引:7
作者
de Burgos-Lunar, Carmen [1 ]
del Cura-Gonzalez, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
Salinero-Fort, Miguel A. [4 ]
Gomez-Campelo, Paloma [4 ]
Perez de Isla, Leopoldo [5 ]
Jimenez-Garcia, Rodrigo [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Carlos III, Unidad Epidemiol Clin & Invest, Serv Madrileno Salud, Madrid 28029, Spain
[2] Serv Madrileno Salud, Unidad Apoyo Invest, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Carlos III, Serv Madrileno Salud, Fdn Invest Biomed, Madrid 28029, Spain
[5] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Serv Madrileno Salud, Unidad Imagen Cardiovasc, Madrid, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA | 2013年 / 66卷 / 09期
关键词
Hypertension; Diabetes mellitus; Delayed diagnosis; Primary care; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PREVALENCE; ASSOCIATION; AWARENESS; DEPRESSION; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; ADULTS; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rec.2013.01.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and objectives: Delayed diagnosis of hypertension may result in inadequate blood pressure control and increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to estimate the delay in hypertension diagnosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and the likelihood of a diagnosis within a suitable period (first 6 months), and to analyze the patient and physician characteristics associated with delayed diagnosis. Methods: Retrospective dynamic cohort study, with a 7-year follow-up in primary care, of 8074 adult patients with diabetes who met the diagnostic criteria for hypertension. Two thresholds were considered: 140/90 mmHg and 130/80 mmHg. The time elapsed between meeting these criteria and recording the diagnosis was estimated; the time course of the likelihood of a missed diagnosis and the variables associated with correct diagnosis were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression analysis, respectively. Results: The mean diagnostic delay was 8.9 (15.4) months in patients with blood pressure <140/90 mmHg compared to 15.2 (19.6) months for those with <140/90 mmHg (P<.001). The main variables associated with correct diagnosis were baseline blood pressure >= 140/90 mmHg (odds ratio=2.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.44-3.15), no history of acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio=2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.99), obesity (odds ratio=1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-1.99), absence of depression (odds ratio=1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.08), female sex (odds ratio=1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.46), older age, and taking more intensive antidiabetic therapy. There was an inverse relationship with the age of physicians and a direct relationship with their professional stability. Conclusions: The mean diagnostic delay in hypertension among diabetic patients was greater than 6 months and varied according to the diagnostic threshold used. Patients with baseline blood pressure >= 140/90 mmHg were more likely to receive a timely diagnosis. (C) 2013 Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 706
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Evaluation and control of hypertensive diabetics seen in Primary Care centres in Spain. BRAND II study
    Abellan Aleman, Jose
    Prieto Diaz, Miguel Angel
    Leal Hernandez, Mariano
    Balanza Galindo, Serafin
    De La Sierra Iserte, Alex
    Martell Claros, Nieves
    Garcia Romanos, Fernando
    [J]. ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2011, 43 (06): : 297 - 304
  • [2] Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study
    Adler, AI
    Stratton, IM
    Neil, HAW
    Yudkin, JS
    Matthews, DR
    Cull, CA
    Wright, AD
    Turner, RC
    Holman, RR
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7258): : 412 - 419
  • [3] *AM DIAB ASS, 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, pS80, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.26.2007.S80
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, TYP 2 DIAB NAT CLIN
  • [5] Banegas JR., 2005, Hipertension, V22, P353, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0212-8241(05)71587-5, 10.1016/S0212-8241(05)71587-5]
  • [6] Hypertension in diabetes: A call to action
    Campbell, Norman R. C.
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Larochelle, Pierre
    Tobe, Sheldon
    Chockalingam, Arun
    Ward, Richard
    Morris, Dorothy
    Tsuyuki, Ross
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 25 (05) : 299 - 302
  • [7] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [8] Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care
    Choudhry, NK
    Fletcher, RH
    Soumerai, SB
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (04) : 260 - 273
  • [9] Tight Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Hypertensive Patients With Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease
    Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.
    Gong, Yan
    Handberg, Eileen M.
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    Denardo, Scott J.
    Bakris, George L.
    Pepine, Carl J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (01): : 61 - 68
  • [10] Effects of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Cushman, William C.
    Evans, Gregory W.
    Byington, Robert P.
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Grimm, Richard H., Jr.
    Cutler, Jeffrey A.
    Simons-Morton, Denise G.
    Basile, Jan N.
    Corson, Marshall A.
    Probstfield, Jeffrey L.
    Katz, Lois
    Peterson, Kevin A.
    Friedewald, William T.
    Buse, John B.
    Bigger, J. Thomas
    Gerstein, Hertzel C.
    Ismail-Beigi, Faramarz
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (17) : 1575 - 1585