Comparative response of onion (Allium cepa) to two sources of sulphur

被引:0
|
作者
Jaggi, R. C. [1 ]
Sharma, R. K.
Gupta, Sonika
机构
[1] Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vi, Dept Soil Sci, Palampur 176062, MP, India
[2] Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vi, Dept Agr Econ, Palampur 176062, MP, India
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2006年 / 76卷 / 03期
关键词
multifertilizer response model; fertilizer testing model; dummy variable; limiting yield; optimum yield; onion; S-95; gypsum;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
An experiment was conducted during 2000-01 and 2001-02 at Palampur to compare the effects of 2 sources of sulphur (S-95 and gypsum) on onion (Allium cepa L.) crop under acidic soil and to work out their optimum doses independently. Fertilizer Testing Model was used to know the differences in the fertilizers at linear as well as curvature level. The other statistical tools like 't' test considers linearity and curvature independently. The results showed the Superiority of gypsum in response both at linear and curvature level by 0.0721 and 0.00066 tonne/ha. This implies that not only the limiting (maximum yield) was higher but the response / kg gypsum was also more. Multi fertilizer Response Model was used to work Out the optimum dose of fertilizers. The results indicated Optimum level of S-95 to be 42.14 kg/ha as against 55.17 for gypsum. The returns over fertilizer cost for S-95 and gypsum were worked out to be Rs 60 911 and 81 306 respectively. The study clearly indicates that gypsum is a superior S source for onion crop.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 147
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Variable irrigation and fertigation effects on response of onion (Allium cepa) in a semi-arid environment
    Kumar, Satyendra
    Imtiyaz, M.
    Kumar, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2008, 78 (03): : 203 - 207
  • [22] Growth and yield response of onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes to different levels of fertilizers
    Islam, M. K.
    Alam, M. F.
    Islam, A. K. M. R.
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 36 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [23] Implementation of response surface methodology to optimise extraction of onion (Allium cepa) solid waste phenolics
    Kiassos, Elias
    Mylonaki, Stefania
    Makris, Dimitris P.
    Kefalas, Panagiotis
    INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, 10 (02) : 246 - 252
  • [24] Present status of haploidy research in onion (Allium cepa) - A review
    Khar, Anil
    Islam, Sabina
    Kalia, Pritam
    Bhatia, Reeta
    Kumar, Arun
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2019, 89 (03): : 396 - 405
  • [25] Determination of Quercetins in Onion (Allium cepa) Using Infrared Spectroscopy
    Lu, Xiaonan
    Ross, Carolyn F.
    Powers, Joseph R.
    Rasco, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2011, 59 (12) : 6376 - 6382
  • [26] Purification and cloning of a γ-glutamyl transpeptidase from onion (Allium cepa)
    Shaw, ML
    Pither-Joyce, MD
    McCallum, JA
    PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 66 (05) : 515 - 522
  • [27] Testosterone in Males as Enhanced by Onion (Allium Cepa L.)
    Banihani, Saleem Ali
    BIOMOLECULES, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [28] BIOACTIVE COMPONENTS OF ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.) - A REVIEW
    Bystricka, J.
    Musilova, J.
    Vollmannova, A.
    Timoracka, M.
    Kavalcova, P.
    ACTA ALIMENTARIA, 2013, 42 (01) : 11 - 22
  • [29] Technique for controlled pollination in onion (Allium cepa) breeding programmes
    Rao, ES
    Gowda, RV
    Singh, TH
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2002, 72 (12): : 706 - 708
  • [30] Anthracnose of Onion (Allium cepa L.): A Twister Disease
    Dutta, Ram
    Jayalakshmi, K.
    Nadig, Sharath M.
    Manjunathagowda, Dalasanuru Chandregowda
    Gurav, Vishal S.
    Singh, Major
    PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (08):