Improving simulation of soil water balance using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate

被引:9
作者
Soldevilla-Martinez, M. [1 ]
Lopez-Urrea, R. [2 ]
Martinez-Molina, L. [2 ]
Quemada, M. [1 ]
Lizaso, J. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Madrid, Dept Crop Prod, ETSIA, Ave Complutense S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] ITAP FUNDESCAM, Water Management Res Unit, Albacete 02080, Spain
来源
FOUR DECADES OF PROGRESS IN MONITORING AND MODELING OF PROCESSES IN THE SOIL-PLANT-ATMOSPHERE SYSTEM: APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES | 2013年 / 19卷
关键词
Water balance; DSSAT; drainage; evapotranspiration; soil water content; optimization; EVAPORATION; REDISTRIBUTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.060
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Water balance simulation in cropping systems is a very useful tool to study how water can be used efficiently. However this requires that models simulate an accurate water balance. Comparing model results with field observations will provide information on the performance of the models. The objective of this study was to test the performance of DSSAT model in simulating the water balance by comparing the simulations with observed measurements. The soil water balance in DSSAT uses a one dimensional "tipping bucket" soil water balance approach where available soil water is determined by the drained upper limit (DUL), lower limit (LL) and saturated water content (SAT). A continuous weighing lysimeter was used to get the observed values of drainage and evapotranspiration (ET). An automated agrometeorological weather station close to the lisymeter was also used to record the climatic data. The model simulated accurately the soil water content after the optimization of the soil parameters. However it was found the inability of the model to capture small changes in daily drainage and ET. For that reason simulated cumulative values had larger errors as the time passed by. These results suggested the need to compare outputs of DSSAT and some hydrological model that simulates soil water movement with a more mechanistic approach. The comparison of the two models will allow us to find which mechanism can be modified or incorporated in DSSAT model to improve the simulations. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 542
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1972, NAT ENG HDB, DOI DOI 10.1-10.23
  • [2] Doorenbos J., 1977, Food and Agriculture Organization Irrigation and Drainage Paper, Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements
  • [3] GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF STATISTICAL FUNCTIONS WITH SIMULATED ANNEALING
    GOFFE, WL
    FERRIER, GD
    ROGERS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1994, 60 (1-2) : 65 - 99
  • [4] Hoogenboom G., 2010, DECIS SUPPORT SYST
  • [5] Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate
    Lopez-Urrea, R.
    Martin de Santa Olalla, F.
    Fabeiro, C.
    Moratalla, A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 85 (1-2) : 15 - 26
  • [6] Lopez-Urrea R., 2004, THESIS
  • [7] Laboratory versus Field Calibration of Capacitance Probes
    Luis Gabriel, Jose
    Lizaso, Jon I.
    Quemada, Miguel
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (02) : 593 - 601
  • [8] Maturano M., 2002, THESIS
  • [9] Extension of an Existing Model for Soil Water Evaporation and Redistribution under High Water Content Conditions
    Ritchie, Joe T.
    Porter, Cheryl H.
    Judge, Jasmeet
    Jones, James W.
    Suleiman, Ayman A.
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2009, 73 (03) : 792 - 801
  • [10] WATER DYNAMICS IN THE SOIL-PLANT-ATMOSPHERE SYSTEM
    RITCHIE, JT
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1981, 58 (1-3) : 81 - 96