The Costs of Warfarin Underuse and Nonadherence in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Commercial Insurer Perspective

被引:79
作者
Casciano, Julian P. [1 ]
Dotiwala, Zenobia J. [1 ]
Martin, Bradley C. [2 ]
Kwong, Winghan Jacqueline [3 ]
机构
[1] EMAX Hlth Syst LLC, White Plains, NY 10601 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Evaluat & Policy, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] Daiichi Sankyo Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Parsippany, NJ USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY | 2013年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES; ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY; ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; STROKE PREVENTION; NATIONAL REGISTRY; RISK; HEMORRHAGE; ADHERENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.4.302
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) imposes a substantial clinical and economic burden on the U.S. health care system. Despite national guidelines that recommend oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention, the literature consistently reports its underuse in AF patients with moderate to high stroke risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess the economic burden of underuse and nonadherence of warfarin therapy among patients with nonvalvular AF in a commercially insured population. METHODS: Claims data between January 2003 and December 2007 from the Thomson Reuters Market Scan Research Database were used. Patients diagnosed with nonvalvular AF who were continuously enrolled for at least 12 months prior to and 2 months following their diagnosis, who had a CHADS(2) score >= 2, and were not at high risk of bleeding (ATRIA score <5, HEMORR(2)HAGE score <4, and HAS-BLED score <3) at baseline were included. Patients were followed for up to 18 months after the AF diagnosis date to assess the level of warfarin utilization. Health care resource utilization and cost during follow-up among patients with the proportion of days covered (PDC) by warfarin >0.8 (high) and <= 0.8 (low) versus patients with no warfarin exposure were assessed. Multivariate negative binomial regressions and generalized linear models were used to estimate differences in resource utilization and cost, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 13,289 subjects included in this analysis, 47% had no warfarin exposure; 31.5% had low PDC; and 21.5% had high PDC. The rates of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (per 100 patient-years) were significantly lower for the groups that had high and low PDCs as compared with the group with no warfarin exposure (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with high PDC were 27% less likely (P<0.001) to incur hospitalizations, and 16% were less likely (P=0.019) to incur emergency room visits than patients who did not receive warfarin, but the differences between low PDC patients and no warfarin exposure were not significant. Although both low and high PDC were associated with lower all-cause inpatient cost (P<0.001), only high PDC was associated with a lower post-index all-cause total cost (P<0.001) compared with no warfarin exposure. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that underutilization and nonadherence of warfarin among nonvalvular AF patients is both prevalent and costly. Warfarin use among patients with moderate to high stroke risk and low to moderate bleed risk demonstrated a stroke benefit without a significant increase in intracranial hemorrhage. Adherence to oral anticoagulant therapy was associated with a significant reduction in inpatient service use and total health care cost. Improving adherence to oral anticoagulation is important to attaining the clinical and economic benefits of therapy. Copyright (C) 2013, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 316
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Meta-Analysis to Assess the Quality of Warfarin Control in Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States
    Baker, William L.
    Cios, Deborah A.
    Sander, Stephen D.
    Coleman, Craig I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2009, 15 (03): : 244 - 252
  • [2] Camm A., 2011, EUROPEAN CARDIOLOGY, V7, P187
  • [3] Camm AJ, 2010, EUROPACE, V12, P1360, DOI [10.1093/europace/euq350, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq278]
  • [4] Caro JJ, 2004, AM J MANAG CARE, V10, pS451
  • [5] Casciano JP, 2012, AM J CARDIOVASC DRUG, V12, P313, DOI 10.2165/11634150-000000000-00000
  • [6] Assessing the direct costs of treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States
    Coyne, Karin S.
    Paramore, Clark
    Grandy, Susan
    Mercader, Marco
    Reynolds, Matthew
    Zimetbaum, Peter
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (05) : 348 - 356
  • [7] A comparison of multivariable regression models to analyse cost data
    Dodd, S
    Bassi, A
    Bodger, K
    Williamson, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (01) : 76 - 86
  • [8] A New Risk Scheme to Predict Warfarin-Associated Hemorrhage The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study
    Fang, Margaret C.
    Go, Alan S.
    Chang, Yuchiao
    Borowsky, Leila H.
    Pomernacki, Niela K.
    Udaltsova, Natalia
    Singer, Daniel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (04) : 395 - 401
  • [9] Warfarin Discontinuation After Starting Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation
    Fang, Margaret C.
    Go, Alan S.
    Chang, Yuchiao
    Borowsky, Leila H.
    Pomernacki, Niela K.
    Udaltsova, Natalia
    Singer, Daniel E.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2010, 3 (06): : 624 - 631
  • [10] Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: Results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF)
    Gage, BF
    Yan, Y
    Milligan, PE
    Waterman, AD
    Culverhouse, R
    Rich, MW
    Radford, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (03) : 713 - 719