Intra-specific competition in maize: Contribution of extreme plant hierarchies to grain yield, grain yield components and kernel composition

被引:75
|
作者
Maddonni, GA [1 ]
Otegui, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, Dpto Prod Vegetal, RA-1417 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
maize; plant grain yield; grain yield components; kernel composition; plant hierarchies;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2005.09.013
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Maize (Zea mays L.) cropping conditions that promote high intra-specific competition pressure generate an increased plant-to-plant variability within the stand, and the appearance of individuals with different ability to capture scarce resources (i.e. dominant and dominated plants). The objectives of this paper were to analyze (i) stand density effects on plant biomass at physiological maturity (R-6), grain yield per plant (GYP), GYP components (KNP: kernel number per plant; KW: kernel weight), and kernel composition (starch, oil and protein contents per kernel) of the mean plant of the stand (i.e. considering all individuals) and of the dominant (D) and dominated (d) individuals; and (ii) the contribution of these extreme plant hierarchies to GYP, GYP components and kernel composition of the mean plant of a stand. Four maize hybrids of contrasting KW (small and large KW) were cropped at a wide range of stand densities (3-15 pl m(-2))during 1999/2000 and 2001/2002 in Argentina. The mean value of measured variables declined as plant density increased from 3 to 15 pi m-2, and plant-to-plant variability (CV: coefficient of variation) of the same variables increased with enhanced crowding. The magnitude of the reduction in mean plant values differed among variables: plant biomass at R-6, GYP and KNP underwent a larger reduction (ca. 66%) than KW (ca. 14-19%) or kernel contents (ca. 22% for oil and protein contents, and 13% for starch content). Similarly, the increase in CVs was larger for plant biomass at R6 (from ca. 13 to 40%) and GYP (from ca. 30 to 58 and 15 to 38% for small and large KW hybrids, respectively) than for KW (ca. from 7 to 20%). Only a slight increase in CVs of oil (6-17%) and protein (9-12%) concentrations of large KW hybrids was recorded. The CV of KNP followed a trend similar to that for GYP. Differences between plant categories increased when mean GYP and KNP of all individuals of the stand were smaller than 157 g pl(-1) and 649 kernel pl(-1), respectively. Below these thresholds, the d/D ratio dropped from 0.76 to 0.30 (small KW hybrids) or to 0.40 (large KW hybrids) for GYP (r(2) = 0.76, P < 0.001), and from 0.75 to 0.38 (small KW hybrids) or to 0.46 (large KW hybrids) for KNP (r(2) = 0.59, P < 0.001). In contrast, the d/D ratio for KW varied always from 1 to 0.80 in response to decreased mean KW (r(2) = 0.39, P < 0.01). The concentration of kernel contents did not differ between plant types. Results indicate that grain yield of maize crops grown at high stand densities is composed by plants bearing very different kernel numbers, with slight differences in kernel size, and similar starch, oil and protein concentration. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 166
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of the length of the kernel filling period and the kernel filling rate on the grain yield of maize under different water supply conditions
    G. Hadi
    Cereal Research Communications, 2004, 32 (4) : 465 - 470
  • [42] Effect of the length of the kernel filling period and the kernel filling rate on the grain yield of maize under different water supply conditions
    Hadi, G
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 32 (04) : 465 - 470
  • [43] Flowering dynamics, pollen, and pistil contribution to grain yield in response to high temperature during maize flowering
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Tao, Hongbin
    Tian, Beijing
    Sheng, Dechang
    Xu, Chenchen
    Zhou, Heming
    Huang, Shoubing
    Wang, Pu
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2019, 158 : 80 - 88
  • [44] Contribution of total dry matter and harvest index to maize grain yield-A multisource data analysis
    Liu, Wanmao
    Hou, Peng
    Liu, Guangzhou
    Yang, Yunshan
    Guo, Xiaoxia
    Ming, Bo
    Xie, Ruizhi
    Wang, Keru
    Liu, Yuee
    Li, Shaokun
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2020, 9 (04):
  • [45] ESTIMATION OF SOME GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS OF MAIZE UNDER WATERED AND WATER STRESS
    Hassan, W. A.
    Hadi, B. H.
    Wuhaib, K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 14 (02): : 553 - 559
  • [46] Maize grain yield and water use efficiency in relation to climatic factors and plant population in northern China
    Liu Yue-E
    Hou Peng
    Huang Gui-rong
    Zhong Xiu-li
    Li Hao-ru
    Zhao Jiu-ran
    Li Shao-ku
    Mei Xu-rong
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2021, 20 (12) : 3156 - 3169
  • [47] Copper Nanoparticle Application Enhances Plant Growth and Grain Yield in Maize Under Drought Stress Conditions
    Van Nguyen, Dong
    Nguyen, Huong Mai
    Le, Nga Thanh
    Nguyen, Kien Huu
    Nguyen, Hoa Thi
    Le, Huong Mai
    Nguyen, Anh Trung
    Dinh, Ngan Thi Thu
    Hoang, Son Anh
    Van Ha, Chien
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2022, 41 (01) : 364 - 375
  • [48] Copper Nanoparticle Application Enhances Plant Growth and Grain Yield in Maize Under Drought Stress Conditions
    Dong Van Nguyen
    Huong Mai Nguyen
    Nga Thanh Le
    Kien Huu Nguyen
    Hoa Thi Nguyen
    Huong Mai Le
    Anh Trung Nguyen
    Ngan Thi Thu Dinh
    Son Anh Hoang
    Chien Van Ha
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41 : 364 - 375
  • [49] Grain yield and yield components of single, double, and synthetic maize lines grown at four N levels in three ecological zones of West Africa
    Akintoye, HA
    Lucas, EO
    Kling, JG
    TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1999, 76 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [50] Grain yield and kernel weight of two maize genotypes differing in nitrogen use efficiency at various levels of nitrogen and carbohydrate availability during flowering and grain filling
    Paponov, IA
    Sambo, P
    Erley, GSA
    Presterl, T
    Geiger, HH
    Engels, C
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2005, 272 (1-2) : 111 - 123