Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough

被引:107
作者
Bell, Shannon Elizabeth [1 ]
Daggett, Cara [2 ]
Labuski, Christine [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Mayapple Energy Transit Collect, Dept Sociol, Blacksburg, VA USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Mayapple Energy Transit Collect, Dept Polit Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Mayapple Energy Transit Collect, Womens & Gender Studies, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
Ecofeminism; Just transition; Energy democracy; Fossil fuels; Feminist energy; Degrowth; CHANGE DECISION-MAKING; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FOSSIL-FUELS; GENDER; IDENTITY; MASCULINITY; RETHINKING; SCIENCE; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101557
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Growth in renewable energy does not displace fossil fuel use on a one-to-one basis, but rather increases the total amount of energy that is produced. As numerous scholars have argued, an energy transition away from - rather than in addition to - fossil fuels will require more than technology and financial capital. Here we argue that a feminist perspective on energy provides an important framework for understanding what keeps us stuck in unsustainable energy cultures, as well as a paradigm for designing truly just energy systems. Feminist approaches have been widely taken up in environmental and ecofeminist work, as well as in climate change research. In energy studies, however, gender-related research has tended to focus more narrowly on women's issues. Although this is crucial work, the focus on women represents just one dimension of what feminism can bring to the study of energy. Feminist theory also offers expertise in the study of power more broadly, which is widely applicable to the full spectrum of energy research. This article outlines a feminist energy research agenda that addresses many aspects of energy system design, planning, exchange, and use. We analyze energy along four intersecting coordinates: the political (democratic, decentralized and pluralist); economic (prioritizing human well-being and biodiversity over profit and unlimited growth); socio-ecological (preferring relationality over individualism); and technological (privileging distributed and decentralized fuel power and people power). In doing so, we show that feminism is well-suited for navigating the tangled web of power, profit, and technological innovation that comprises human fuel use.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 152 条
[111]   Linking energy access, gender and poverty: A review of the literature on productive uses of energy [J].
Pueyo, Ana ;
Maestre, Mar .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 53 :170-181
[112]   Solar power, state power, and the politics of energy transition in pre-Saharan Morocco [J].
Rignall, Karen Eugenie .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2016, 48 (03) :540-557
[113]  
Rolston Jessica Smith, 2014, UNDERMINING GENDER R
[114]  
Rosa Eugene A., 1997, CROSS NATL TRENDS FO
[115]   Rethinking gender and identity in energy studies [J].
Ryan, Sarah E. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 :96-105
[116]   Developing an intersectionally-informed, multi-sited, critical policy ethnography to examine power and procedural justice in multiscalar energy and climate change decisionmaking processes [J].
Ryder, Stacia S. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 45 :266-275
[117]  
Salleh A.K., 1997, ECOFEMINISM POLITICS
[118]  
Sanders LS, 2007, THIRD WAVE FEMINISM: A CRITICAL EXPLORATION, EXPANDED 2ND EDITION, P3
[119]  
Sasser Jade., 2018, INFERTILE GROUND POP
[120]  
Scheer H., 2004, The solar economy: renewable energy for a sustainable global future