RETRACTED: Analysis of compression forces between varying sizes of cannulated screws versus rail external fixation for treatment of Jones type fifth metatarsal fracture (Retracted Article)

被引:6
作者
Freschi, Scot A. [1 ]
Vardaxis, Vassilios [1 ]
Dodson, Nic [1 ]
机构
[1] Des Moines Univ, Coll Podiatr Med & Surg, Des Moines, IA 50312 USA
关键词
cannulated screw; external fixation; fracture fixation; Jones fracture; metatarsal fracture;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2008.04.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compared peak compression load in Newtons and stiffness in Newtons/millimeter for varying interfragmental screw sizes versus mini rail external fixation for the surgical treatment of Jones fifth metatarsal fractures. Four groups were included into this study: (1) Jones fracture with external fixation (Orthofix, Inc., McKinney, TX); (2) Jones fracture with 4.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw; (3) Jones fracture with 5.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw; and (4) Jones fracture with 6.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw. There was no statistically significant difference between the peak compression achieved with the different groups of interfragmental cannulated screws: 4.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 30.56 (+/- 9.40) N; 5.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 30.69 (+/- 10.75) N; and 6.5-mm interfragmental cannulated screw = 32.84 (+/- 9.65) N. When comparing the compression achieved with the different groups of interfragmental cannulated screws to that achieved with the small rail external fixator (69.70 [+/- 14.69] N), a statistically significant difference was noted. There was no statistically significant difference in regard to stiffness (Newtons/millimeter) noted between the intramedullary cannulated screw groups: 4.5 cannulated screw 5.25 (+/- 1.96), 5.5 cannulated screw 5.50 (+/- 2.01), and 6.5 cannulated screw 6.75 (+/- 2.60). A statistically significant difference was noted when the stiffness (Newtons/millimeter) of the rail external fixator (12.69 (+/- 4.52) was compared to the stiffness achieved with the different interfragmental screws. The results indicated that the small rail external fixation device provided increased compression and an increased ability to resist bending when compared to the different intramedullary cannulated screws.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 298
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] CLAPPER MF, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P238
  • [2] Fractures of the fifth metatarsal in basketball players
    Fairen, MF
    Guillen, J
    Busto, JM
    Roura, J
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 7 (06) : 373 - 377
  • [3] Jones R, 1902, ANN SURG, V35, P697
  • [4] JONES FRACTURE REVISITED
    KAVANAUGH, JH
    BROWER, TD
    MANN, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1978, 60 (06) : 776 - 782
  • [5] Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures
    Kelly, IP
    Glisson, RR
    Fink, C
    Easley, ME
    Nunley, JA
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 22 (07) : 585 - 589
  • [6] Lombardi Charles M, 2004, J Foot Ankle Surg, V43, P173, DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2004.03.002
  • [7] OUTPATIENT PERCUTANEOUS SCREW FIXATION OF THE ACUTE JONES FRACTURE
    MINDREBO, N
    SHELBOURNE, KD
    VANMETER, CD
    RETTIG, AC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (05) : 720 - 723
  • [8] THE INTRAOSSEOUS BLOOD-SUPPLY OF THE 5TH METATARSAL - IMPLICATIONS FOR PROXIMAL FRACTURE-HEALING
    SMITH, JW
    ARNOCZKY, SP
    HERSH, A
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (03): : 143 - 152