EVALUATION OF AMIP-TYPE ATMOSPHERIC FIELDS AS FORCING FOR MEDITERRANEAN SEA AND GLOBAL OCEAN REANALYSES

被引:0
作者
Cherchi, Annalisa [1 ,2 ]
Ratna, Satyaban Bishoyi [3 ]
Masina, Simona [1 ,2 ]
Storto, Andrea [1 ]
Yang, Chunxue [4 ]
Fratianni, Claudia [2 ]
Simoncelli, Simona [2 ]
Pinardi, Nadia [5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Ctr Euromediterraneo Cambiamenti Climatici, Bologna, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Natl Res Council ISMAR CNR, Inst Marine Sci, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
INDIAN-OCEAN; PART I; PRECIPITATION; VARIABILITY; MODEL; SURFACE; CLIMATOLOGY; OSCILLATION; CIRCULATION; FORECASTS;
D O I
10.4401/ag-7793
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Oceanic reanalyses are powerful products to reconstruct the historical 3D-state of the ocean and related circulation. At present a challenge is to have oceanic reanalyses covering the whole 20th century. This study describes the exercise of comparing available datasets to force Mediterranean Sea and global oceanic reanalyses from 1901 to present. In particular, we compared available atmospheric reanalyses with a set of experiments performed with an atmospheric general circulation model where sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice concentration are prescribed. These types of experiments have the advantage of covering long tune records, at least for the period for which global SST is available. and they can be performed at relatively high horizontal resolutions, a very important requisite for regional oceanic reanalyses. However, they are limited by the intrinsic model biases in representing the mean atmospheric state and its variability. In this study, we show that, within some limits, the atmospheric model performance in representing the basic variables needed for the bulk-formulae to force oceanic data assimilation systems can be comparable to the differences among available atmospheric reanalyses. In the case of the Mediterranean Sea the high horizontal resolution of the set of SST-prescribed experiments combined with their good performance in representing the surface winds in the area made them the most appropriate atmospheric forcing. On the other hand, in the case of the global ocean, atmospheric reanalyses have been proven to be still preferable due to the better representation of spatial and temporal variability of surface winds and radiative fluxes. Because of their intrinsic limitations AMIP experiments cannot provide atmospheric fields alternative to atmospheric reanalyses. Nevertheless, here we show how in the specific case of the Mediterranean Sea, they can be of use, if not preferable, to available atmospheric reanalyses.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Sensitivity of global ocean heat content from reanalyses to the atmospheric reanalysis forcing: A comparative study
    Storto, Andrea
    Yang, Chunxue
    Masina, Simona
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (10) : 5261 - 5270
  • [2] Assessing the Representation of Intraseasonal Oscillation-Related Ocean Forcing in the Tropics in Atmospheric Reanalyses
    Hsu, Wei-Ching
    Kikuchi, Kazuyoshi
    Annamalai, H.
    Richards, Kelvin J.
    JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2022, 100 (02) : 415 - 435
  • [3] Quantifying the effects of observational constraints and uncertainty in atmospheric forcing on historical ocean reanalyses
    Yang, Chunxue
    Storto, Andrea
    Masina, Simona
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 52 (5-6) : 3321 - 3342
  • [4] Steric Sea Level Changes from Ocean Reanalyses at Global and Regional Scales
    Storto, Andrea
    Bonaduce, Antonio
    Feng, Xiangbo
    Yang, Chunxue
    WATER, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [5] Impact of the spatial distribution of the atmospheric forcing on water mass formation in the Mediterranean Sea
    Beranger, Karine
    Drillet, Yann
    Houssais, Marie-Noelle
    Testor, Pierre
    Bourdalle-Badie, Romain
    Alhammoud, Bahjat
    Bozec, Alexandra
    Mortier, Laurent
    Bouruet-Aubertot, Pascale
    Crepon, Michel
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2010, 115
  • [6] A Performance Evaluation of CMIP6 Wind Fields for Robust Forcing in Indian Ocean Wave Climate Studies
    Sreejith, Meenakshi
    Remya, P. G.
    Sreelakshmi, S.
    Kumar, B. Praveen
    Malavika, S.
    Nair, T. M. Balakrishnan
    Kumar, T. Srinivasa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2025, 45 (04)
  • [7] An ERA40-based atmospheric forcing for global ocean circulation models
    Brodeau, Laurent
    Barnier, Bernard
    Treguier, Anne-Marie
    Penduff, Thierry
    Gulev, Sergei
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2010, 31 (3-4) : 88 - 104
  • [8] The role of local atmospheric forcing on the modulation of the ocean mixed layer depth in reanalyses and a coupled single column ocean model
    Pookkandy, Byju
    Dommenget, Dietmar
    Klingaman, Nicholas
    Wales, Scott
    Chung, Christine
    Frauen, Claudia
    Wolff, Holger
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2016, 47 (9-10) : 2991 - 3010
  • [9] Atmospheric Moisture Transports from Ocean to Land and Global Energy Flows in Reanalyses
    Trenberth, Kevin E.
    Fasullo, John T.
    Mackaro, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (18) : 4907 - 4924
  • [10] Shortwave cloud radiative forcing on major stratus cloud regions in AMIP-type simulations of CMIP3 and CMIP5 models
    Zhang Yi
    Li Jian
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2013, 30 (03) : 884 - 907