Implementation of automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate among Veterans Affairs laboratories: a retrospective study

被引:9
作者
Hall, Rasheeda K. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Virginia [1 ,2 ]
Jackson, George L. [1 ,2 ]
Hammill, Bradley G. [2 ]
Maciejewski, Matthew L. [1 ,2 ]
Yano, Elizabeth M. [3 ,4 ]
Svetkey, Laura P. [2 ,5 ]
Patel, Uptal D. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Primary Care, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Ctr Study Healthcare Provider Behav, Sepulveda, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Sarah W Stedman Nutr & Metab Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; VA PRIMARY-CARE; ESTIMATED GFR; IMPACT; ORGANIZATION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; CKD;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-12-69
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Automated reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a recent advance in laboratory information technology (IT) that generates a measure of kidney function with chemistry laboratory results to aid early detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Because accurate diagnosis of CKD is critical to optimal medical decision-making, several clinical practice guidelines have recommended the use of automated eGFR reporting. Since its introduction, automated eGFR reporting has not been uniformly implemented by U. S. laboratories despite the growing prevalence of CKD. CKD is highly prevalent within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), and implementation of automated eGFR reporting within this integrated healthcare system has the potential to improve care. In July 2004, the VHA adopted automated eGFR reporting through a system-wide mandate for software implementation by individual VHA laboratories. This study examines the timing of software implementation by individual VHA laboratories and factors associated with implementation. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of laboratories in VHA facilities from July 2004 to September 2009. Using laboratory data, we identified the status of implementation of automated eGFR reporting for each facility and the time to actual implementation from the date the VHA adopted its policy for automated eGFR reporting. Using survey and administrative data, we assessed facility organizational characteristics associated with implementation of automated eGFR reporting via bivariate analyses. Results: Of 104 VHA laboratories, 88% implemented automated eGFR reporting in existing laboratory IT systems by the end of the study period. Time to initial implementation ranged from 0.2 to 4.0 years with a median of 1.8 years. All VHA facilities with on-site dialysis units implemented the eGFR software (52%, p < 0.001). Other organizational characteristics were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The VHA did not have uniform implementation of automated eGFR reporting across its facilities. Facility-level organizational characteristics were not associated with implementation, and this suggests that decisions for implementation of this software are not related to facility-level quality improvement measures. Additional studies on implementation of laboratory IT, such as automated eGFR reporting, could identify factors that are related to more timely implementation and lead to better healthcare delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Prevalence of estimated GFR reporting among US clinical laboratories [J].
Accetta, Nancy A. ;
Gladstone, Elisa H. ;
DiSogra, Charles ;
Wright, Elizabeth C. ;
Briggs, Michael ;
Narva, Andrew S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2008, 52 (04) :778-787
[2]   The role of clinical opinion leaders in guideline implementation and quality improvement [J].
Borbas, C ;
Morris, N ;
McLaughlin, B ;
Asinger, R ;
Gobel, F .
CHEST, 2000, 118 (02) :24S-32S
[3]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[4]   Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States [J].
Coresh, Josef ;
Selvin, Elizabeth ;
Stevens, Lesley A. ;
Manzi, Jane ;
Kusek, John W. ;
Eggers, Paul ;
Van Lente, Frederick ;
Levey, Andrew S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (17) :2038-2047
[5]   K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Levin, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) :S14-S266
[6]   Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Robert, G ;
Macfarlane, F ;
Bate, P ;
Kyriakidou, O .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2004, 82 (04) :581-629
[7]   Nephrology Visits and Health Care Resource Use Before and After Reporting Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [J].
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. ;
Zhang, Jianguo ;
Manns, Braden J. ;
James, Matthew T. ;
Quinn, Robert R. ;
Ravani, Pietro ;
Klarenbach, Scott W. ;
Culleton, Bruce F. ;
Krause, Richard ;
Thorlacius, Laurel ;
Jain, Arsh K. ;
Tonelli, Marcello .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (12) :1151-1158
[8]   National Kidney Disease Education Program [J].
Hostetter, TH ;
Lising, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) :S114-S116
[9]  
Jackson GL, 2005, AM J MANAG CARE, V11, P225
[10]   Impact of Estimated GFR Reporting on Patients, Clinicians, and Health-Care Systems: A Systematic Review [J].
Kagoma, Yoan K. ;
Weir, Matthew A. ;
Iansavichus, Arthur V. ;
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. ;
Akbari, Ayub ;
Patel, Uptal D. ;
Garg, Amit X. ;
Jain, Arsh K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2011, 57 (04) :592-601