Design of a multicentered randomized controlled trial on the clinical and cost effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders

被引:19
作者
Bamelis, Lotte L. M. [1 ]
Evers, Silvia M. A. A. [2 ]
Arntz, Arnoud [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Caphri Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci, Netherlands Inst Adv Study Humanities & Social Sc, Wassenaar, Netherlands
关键词
SOCIAL-ADJUSTMENT SCALE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; COGNITIVE THERAPY; OUTPATIENT PSYCHOTHERAPY; FOCUSED THERAPY; AXIS II; AVOIDANT; BORDERLINE; VALIDITY; SELF;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-12-75
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Despite international guidelines describing psychotherapy as first choice for people with personality disorders (PDs), well-designed research on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy for PD is scarce. Schema therapy (ST) is a specific form of psychological treatment that proved to be effective for borderline PD. Randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness of ST for other PDs are lacking. Another not yet tested new specialized treatment is Clarification Oriented Psychotherapy (COP). The aim of this project is to perform an effectiveness study as well as an economic evaluation study (cost effectiveness as well as cost-utility) comparing ST versus COP versus treatment as usual (TAU). In this study, we focus on avoidant, dependent, obsessive-compulsive, paranoid, histrionic and narcissistic PD. Methods/Design: In a multicentered randomized controlled trial, ST, and COP as an extra experimental condition, are compared to TAU. Minimal 300 patients are recruited in 12 mental health institutes throughout the Netherlands, and receive an extensive screening prior to enrolment in the study. When eligible, they are randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups. An economic evaluation and a qualitative research study on patient and therapist perspectives on ST are embedded in this trial. Outcome assessments (both for clinical effectiveness and economic evaluation) take place at 6,12,18,24 and 36 months after start of treatment. Primary outcome is recovery from PD; secondary measures include general psychopathological complaints, social functioning and quality of life. Data for the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses are collected by using a retrospective cost interview. Information on patient and therapist perspectives is gathered using in-depth interviews and focus groups, and focuses on possible helpful and impeding aspects of ST. Discussion: This trial is the first to compare ST and COP head-to-head with TAU for people with a cluster C, paranoid, histrionic and/or narcissistic PD. By combining clinical effectiveness data with an economic evaluation and with direct information from primary stakeholders, this trial offers a complete and thorough view on ST as a contribution to the improvement of treatment for this PD patient group.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, DEV SYSTEM RAT UNPUB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, FARM KOMP 2008
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders, V4th
[5]   Psychotherapy for personality disorders: Short-term day hospital psychotherapy versus outpatient individual therapy - a randomized controlled study [J].
Arnevik, Espen ;
Wilberg, Theresa ;
Urnes, Oyvind ;
Johansen, Merete ;
Monsen, Jon T. ;
Karterud, Sigmund .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 24 (02) :71-78
[6]  
Arntz A, WILEYBLACKWELL HDB S
[7]  
Arntz A, 2006, SCHEMA MODE INVENTOR
[8]  
Arntz A, SCHEMA THERAPY UNPUB
[9]  
Arrindel W.A., 1981, Ned Tijdschr Psych, V36, P77
[10]  
Asselt ADI, 2007, INT SOC PHARMACOECON