Breast US: Assessment of technical quality and image interpretation

被引:45
作者
Baker, JA [1 ]
Soo, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Breast Imaging, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
breast; ACR reporting and data system; US; images; interpretation; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2231011125
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether ultrasonography (US) of the breast performed at a wide range of clinical practices conforms to the American College of Radiology (ACR) standards for quality and to assess the interpretations of breast sonograms. METHODS AND METHODS:,Static images from 152 breast US examinations performed at 86 institutions were evaluated for compliance with ACR guidelines for US hardware, technical factors, imaging protocol, and image annotation. Official interpretations submitted by the referring facilities were compared with static images submitted by the facility. Discrepancies were confirmed by two dedicated breast radiologists after repeat imaging, short-interval follow-up imaging, or biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 60.5% of cases did not comply with at least one ACR guideline on breast US and included 9.2% of cases with inadequate equipment, 14.7% of cases with inappropriate focal zone placement, at least 14% of cases with static images in only one imaging plane, and 25% of cases with incomplete patient identifiers, Clinically relevant interpretation errors and interpretation discrepancies were confirmed in 23 (15.1%) of 152 cases. CONCLUSION: The majority of breast US examinations did not comply with at least some of the standards for quality set forth by the ACR. Attention to these basic standards could substantially improve image quality. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 238
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ACR STAND 2000 2001
  • [2] Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment
    Baker, JA
    Kornguth, PJ
    Soo, MS
    Walsh, R
    Mengoni, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) : 1621 - 1625
  • [3] BICEHOUSE H, 1975, DHEW PUBLICATION
  • [4] Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions:: Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography
    Buchberger, W
    Niehoff, A
    Obrist, P
    DeKoekkoek-Doll, P
    Dünser, M
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2000, 21 (04) : 325 - 336
  • [5] Case for active physician involvement in US practice
    Chan, V
    Hanbidge, A
    Wilson, S
    Pron, G
    Moore, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (02) : 555 - 560
  • [6] MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE 80S
    CONWAY, BJ
    MCCROHAN, JL
    RUETER, FG
    SULEIMAN, OH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (02) : 335 - 339
  • [7] VARIABILITY IN RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS OF MAMMOGRAMS
    ELMORE, JG
    WELLS, CK
    LEE, CH
    HOWARD, DH
    FEINSTEIN, AR
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (22) : 1493 - 1499
  • [8] Galkin B M, 1988, Radiographics, V8, P133
  • [9] Haus A G, 1989, Radiographics, V9, P1203
  • [10] Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987-1995
    Hendrick, RE
    Chrvala, CA
    Plott, CM
    Cutter, GR
    Jessop, NW
    Wilcox-Buchalla, P
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) : 663 - 668