Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges

被引:293
作者
Handy, Susan [1 ]
Van Wee, Bert [2 ]
Kroesen, Maarten [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Transport & Logist Grp, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
cycling; cycling benefits; bicycle infrastructure; travel surveys; longitudinal methods; panel surveys; qualitative methods; cost-benefit analysis; BUILT-ENVIRONMENT; STRUCTURAL MODELS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH-BENEFITS; BICYCLE; TRAVEL; BEHAVIOR; WALKING; WORK; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2013.860204
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Cycling as a mode of transportation has many advantages for both cyclists and society: it is a low-cost, low-polluting, health-improving way to travel. In light of these benefits, a growing number of cities throughout the world are implementing policies to promote cycling, though they continue to struggle to identify the most effective ways to spend their limited resources. In response, transport researchers are also increasingly focusing their efforts on cycling, addressing a broader range of questions than in the past, including: how much cycling is there? What strategies will increase cycling? What are the benefits of increased cycling? This paper reviews the challenges that researchers face in providing answers to these questions by highlighting limitations of the existing research, identifying remaining research needs, and discussing methodological considerations for addressing those needs. Investments in cycling research can pay off by providing a basis for identifying the most effective strategies for increasing cycling and providing more accurate estimates of the benefits that would accrue.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 24
页数:21
相关论文
共 89 条
[21]   Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: A systematic reviews [J].
Cavill, Nick ;
Kahlmeier, Sonja ;
Rutter, Harry ;
Racioppi, Francesca ;
Oja, Pekka .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (05) :291-304
[22]  
Clifton KJ, 2003, TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION, P283
[23]   Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology [J].
Cools, Mario ;
Moons, Elke ;
Janssens, Brecht ;
Wets, Geert .
TRANSPORTATION, 2009, 36 (04) :437-453
[24]  
Curtis C., 2013, I BARRIERS SUSTAINAB
[25]   Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling [J].
Daley, Michelle ;
Rissel, Chris .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (01) :211-216
[26]   Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? [J].
de Hartog, Jeroen Johan ;
Boogaard, Hanna ;
Nijland, Hans ;
Hoek, Gerard .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 118 (08) :1109-1116
[27]   Traveler segmentation strategy with nominal variables through correspondence analysis [J].
Diana, Marco ;
Pronello, Cristina .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2010, 17 (03) :183-190
[28]   Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities - If you build them, commuters will use them [J].
Dill, J ;
Carr, T .
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES 2003: SAFETY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2003, (1828) :116-123
[29]   Factors affecting bicycling demand - Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon, Region [J].
Dill, Jennifer ;
Voros, Kim .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, 2031 (2031) :9-17
[30]   STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR ANALYSIS OF TRAVELER ATTITUDE-BEHAVIOR RELATIONSHIPS [J].
DOBSON, R ;
REIBSTEIN, D ;
LOVELOCK, C ;
DUNBAR, F ;
SMITH, CJ .
TRANSPORTATION, 1978, 7 (04) :351-363