Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales

被引:248
作者
Schweiger, O
Maelfait, JP
Van Wingerden, W
Hendrickx, F
Billeter, R
Speelmans, M
Augenstein, I
Aukema, B
Aviron, S
Bailey, D
Bukacek, R
Burel, F
Diekötter, T
Dirksen, J
Frenzel, M
Herzog, F
Liira, J
Roubalova, M
Bugter, R
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Ctr Environm Res Leipzig Halle, Dept Community Ecol, D-06210 Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[2] Inst Nat Conservat, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, Terr Ecol Unit, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Alterra Green World Res, Landscape Ctr, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Geobot Inst, CH-8044 Zurich, Switzerland
[6] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Ctr Environm Res Leipzig Halle, Dept Appl Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[7] Plant Protect Serv, Sect Entomol, NL-6700 HC Wageningen, Netherlands
[8] Swiss Fed Res Stn Agroecol & Agr, Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[9] Nat Conservat Author, Dept Informat, CZ-14000 Prague, Czech Republic
[10] Univ Rennes 1, UMREcobio, F-35042 Rennes, France
[11] Univ Tartu, Inst Bot & Ecol, EE-51005 Tartu, Estonia
[12] Inst Forest Ecosyst Res, Jilove 25401 1544, Czech Republic
关键词
biodiversity; community structure; functional groups; landscape structure; partial canonical correspondence analysis; variation partitioning;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01085.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. In landscapes influenced by anthropogenic activities, such as intensive agriculture, knowledge of the relative importance and interaction of environmental factors on the composition and function of local communities across a range of spatial scales is important for maintaining biodiversity. 2. We analysed five arthropod taxa covering a broad range of functional aspects (wild bees, true bugs, carabid beetles, hoverflies and spiders) in 24 landscapes (4 x 4 km) across seven European countries along gradients of both land-use intensity and landscape structure. Species-environment relationships were examined in a hierarchical design of four main sets of environmental factors (country, land-use intensity, landscape structure, local habitat properties) that covered three spatial scales (region, landscape, local) by means of hierarchical variability partitioning using partial canonical correspondence analyses. 3. Local community composition and the distribution of body size classes and trophic guilds were most affected by regional processes, which highly confounded landscape and local factors. After correcting for regional effects, factors at the landscape scale dominated over local habitat factors. Land-use intensity explained most of the variability in species data, whereas landscape characteristics (especially connectivity) accounted for most of the variability in body size and trophic guilds. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our results suggest that management effort should be focused on land-use intensity and habitat connectivity in order to enhance diversity in agricultural landscapes. Since these factors are largely independent, specific conservation programmes may be developed with regards to socio-economic and agri-environmental requirements. Changes in either of these factors will enhance diversity but will also result in specific effects on local communities related to dispersal ability and the resource use of species.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1139
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CANOCO REFERENCE MAN
[2]   Ecology - Neutral macroecology [J].
Bell, G .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5539) :2413-2418
[3]   Model evaluation of the function of prey in non-crop habitats for biological control by ladybeetles in agricultural landscapes [J].
Bianchi, FJJA ;
van der Werf, W .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 171 (1-2) :177-193
[4]   PARTIALLING OUT THE SPATIAL COMPONENT OF ECOLOGICAL VARIATION [J].
BORCARD, D ;
LEGENDRE, P ;
DRAPEAU, P .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (03) :1045-1055
[5]  
Brown J.H., 2000, SCALING BIOL
[6]   Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes [J].
Burel, F ;
Baudry, J ;
Butet, A ;
Clergeau, P ;
Delettre, Y ;
Le Coeur, D ;
Dubs, F ;
Morvan, N ;
Paillat, G ;
Petit, S ;
Thenail, C ;
Brunel, E ;
Lefeuvre, JC .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :47-60
[7]   Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensification [J].
Burel, F ;
Butet, A ;
Delettre, YR ;
de la Peña, NM .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 67 (1-4) :195-204
[8]  
CHACOFF N, 2005, IN PRESS J APPL ECOL
[9]   Consequences of changing biodiversity [J].
Chapin, FS ;
Zavaleta, ES ;
Eviner, VT ;
Naylor, RL ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Reynolds, HL ;
Hooper, DU ;
Lavorel, S ;
Sala, OE ;
Hobbie, SE ;
Mack, MC ;
Diaz, S .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :234-242
[10]   Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships [J].
Cushman, SA ;
McGarigal, K .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2002, 17 (07) :637-646