Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiacloprid

被引:34
作者
Abdourahime, Himdata
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Barmaz, Stefania
Brancato, Alba
Brocca, Daniela
Bura, Laszlo
Cabrera, Luis Carrasco
Chiusolo, Arianna
Civitella, Consuelo
Marques, Daniele Court
Crivellente, Federica
Ctverackova, Lucie
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Ferreira, Lucien
Gatto, Valeria
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Jose Oriol
Medina, Paula
Messinetti, Silvia
Mineo, Desire
Miron, Ileana
Nave, Stefanie
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Morte, Juan Manuel Parra
Pedersen, Ragnor
Raczyk, Marianna
Reich, Hermine
Ruocco, Silvia
Saari, Katri Elina
Sacchi, Angela
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Streissl, Franz
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Tarazona, Jose
机构
关键词
thiacloprid; peer review; risk assessment; pesticide; insecticide;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5595
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom and co-rapporteur Member State Germany for the pesticide active substance thiacloprid are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of thiacloprid as an insecticide on oilseed rape foliar use and maize seed treatment. The peer review also provided conclusions on whether exposure of humans to thiacoprid can be considered negligible, taking into account the European Commission's draft guidance on this topic. Confirmatory data following the review of existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 were also assessed in this conclusion. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. An evaluation of data concerning the necessity of thiacloprid as an insecticide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means, including non-chemical methods is presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. (C) 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, FOCUS SURF WAT SCEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SANCO303099REV4 EUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], EFSA JOURNAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Opinion proposing harmonised classification and labelling at EU level of Quinolin‐8‐ol
[5]  
8‐hydroxyquinoline EC Number: 205-711‐1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GUID DOC EST PERS DE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SANCO/221/2000rev. 10 final
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EFSA J, DOI DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2013.3298
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, JOINT M FAO PAN EXP
[10]  
[Anonymous], EFSA J