Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland

被引:134
作者
Foley, S. J. [1 ]
McEntee, M. F. [2 ]
Rainford, L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med & Med Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; CANCER-RISKS;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/15839549
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To propose Irish CT diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) by collecting radiation doses for the most commonly performed CT examinations. Methods: A pilot study investigated the most frequent CT examinations. 40 CT sites were then asked to complete a survey booklet to allow the recording of CT parameters for each of 9 CT examinations during a 12-week period. Dose data [CT volume index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP)] on a minimum of 10 average-sized patients in each category were recorded to calculate a mean site CTDIvol and DLP value. The rounded 75th percentile was used to calculate a DRL for each site and the country by compiling all results. Results are compared with international DRL data. Results: Data were collected for 3305 patients. 30 sites responded with data for 34 scanners, representing 54% of the national total. All equipment had multislice capability (2-128 slices). DRLs are proposed using CTDIvol (mGy) and DLP (mGy cm) for CT head (66/58 and 940, respectively), sinuses (16 and 210, respectively), cervical spine (19 and 420, respectively), thorax (9/11 and 390, respectively), high resolution CT (7 and 280, respectively), CT pulmonary angiography (13 and 430, respectively), multiphase abdomen (13 and 1120, respectively), routine abdomen/pelvis (12 and 600, respectively) and trunk examinations (10/12 and 850, respectively). These values are lower than current DRLs and comparable to other international studies. Wide variations in mean doses are noted across sites. Conclusions: Baseline figures for Irish CT DRLs are provided on the most frequently performed CT examinations. The variations in dose between CT departments as well as between identical scanners suggest a large potential for optimisation of examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:1390 / 1397
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DIAGN REF LEV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ann ICRP, V33, P1, DOI [10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00024-1, DOI 10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00024-1]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ANN ICRP, V26, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SURVEY CT PRACTICE 2
[5]   Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007 [J].
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington ;
Mahesh, Mahadevappa ;
Kim, Kwang-Pyo ;
Bhargavan, Mythreyi ;
Lewis, Rebecca ;
Mettler, Fred ;
Land, Charles .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (22) :2071-2077
[6]  
European Community, 1997, HLTH PROT IND DANG I, P22
[7]  
Faculty of Radiologists, 2010, GUID IMPL NAT QUAL A
[8]  
Federal Office for Radiation Protection, 2010, NOT DIAGN REF LEV RA
[9]  
Friberg E. G., 2009, NATL COLLECTION LOCA
[10]   Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology [J].
Hall, E. J. ;
Brenner, D. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 81 (965) :362-378