Object Learning Improves Feature Extraction but Does Not Improve Feature Selection

被引:5
作者
Holm, Linus [1 ]
Engel, Stephen [2 ]
Schrater, Paul [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Psychol, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Psychol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
ATTENTION; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0051325
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A single glance at your crowded desk is enough to locate your favorite cup. But finding an unfamiliar object requires more effort. This superiority in recognition performance for learned objects has at least two possible sources. For familiar objects observers might: 1) select more informative image locations upon which to fixate their eyes, or 2) extract more information from a given eye fixation. To test these possibilities, we had observers localize fragmented objects embedded in dense displays of random contour fragments. Eight participants searched for objects in 600 images while their eye movements were recorded in three daily sessions. Performance improved as subjects trained with the objects: The number of fixations required to find an object decreased by 64% across the 3 sessions. An ideal observer model that included measures of fragment confusability was used to calculate the information available from a single fixation. Comparing human performance to the model suggested that across sessions information extraction at each eye fixation increased markedly, by an amount roughly equal to the extra information that would be extracted following a 100% increase in functional field of view. Selection of fixation locations, on the other hand, did not improve with practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   INTERACTION EFFECTS IN PARAFOVEAL LETTER RECOGNITION [J].
BOUMA, H .
NATURE, 1970, 226 (5241) :177-&
[2]   Scene consistency in object and background perception [J].
Davenport, JL ;
Potter, MC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (08) :559-564
[3]   Learning cue validity through performance feedback [J].
Droll, Jason A. ;
Abbey, Craig K. ;
Eckstein, Miguel P. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (02)
[4]   Action plans used in action observation [J].
Flanagan, JR ;
Johansson, RS .
NATURE, 2003, 424 (6950) :769-771
[5]   Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search [J].
Gilchrist, ID ;
Harvey, M .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (19) :1209-1212
[6]  
Hochberg J.E., 1964, Perception
[7]   A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis [J].
Itti, L ;
Koch, C ;
Niebur, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1998, 20 (11) :1254-1259
[8]   Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation [J].
Johansson, RS ;
Westling, GR ;
Bäckström, A ;
Flanagan, JR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (17) :6917-6932
[9]   Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention [J].
Li, FF ;
VanRullen, R ;
Koch, C ;
Perona, P .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (14) :9596-9601
[10]   Visual scene memory and the guidance of saccadic eye movements [J].
Melcher, D ;
Kowler, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (25-26) :3597-3611