Assessing environmental impacts of municipal solid waste of Johor by analytical hierarchy process

被引:55
作者
Abba, Ahmad Halilu [1 ]
Noor, Zainura Zainon [1 ]
Yusuf, Rafiu O. [1 ]
Din, Mohd Fadhil M. D. [2 ]
Abu Hassan, Mohd Ariffin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Chem Engn, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Civil Engn, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
关键词
Habitat depletion; Analytical hierarchy process; Super decisions; Johor Bahru; Stream ecology; Environmental impacts; MINIMIZING EMISSIONS; RANK PRESERVATION; ALTERNATIVE FUEL; MANAGEMENT; DECISION; GIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The views of the public on solid waste bound to be generated in Johor Bahru Malaysia are presented and appraised. This is because of the massive development currently going on to transform the city to an international standing by the year 2025. For this reason, attempts to raise stakeholder awareness on the need to embrace on how best to manage the current problem with reduced impacts to the environment currently and in the future was attempted. Data were collected through contacts and questionnaire survey. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) technique was used to structure and assess the views and judgments of stakeholders on the environmental impacts of solid waste disposal. SuperDecision software was used to generate and compute results of stakeholder's judgments. The assessment revealed that fauna and flora, habitat depletion and land use among the criteria are most critical environmental impacts. Landfilling, recycling, incineration and composting were evaluated in terms of the environmental impacts. The choice of incineration is perceived to improve environmental visibility, preserves fauna and flora as well as stream ecology, improves environmental air quality and optimizes land use. Similarly, recycling of waste, is perceived to preserves fauna and flora, stream ecology, habitat depletion, improves air quality as well as land use. Composting is perceived to be the best option in terms of preservation of stream ecology, habitat depletion and land use practice. Landfill generates less noise and vibration but found to be responsible for more than 50% of the environmental impacts created by solid waste in this area. Composting and recycling are mostly preferred to landfilling and incineration and the reason why this is so was provided. The study also identified challenges ahead and highlights that benefits attached to some vital disposal options (such as incineration) are yet to be fully implemented. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Abba AH, 2010, J ENVIRON SCI, VIV, P65
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, KL09020001 MAUNS MAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, KL09020001
  • [4] Blair A.R., 2010, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, V44, P114, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2010.03.002, 10.1016/i/seps.2010.03.022, DOI 10.1016/I/SEPS.2010.03.022, 10.1016/j.seps.2010.03.002]
  • [5] Blanc I, 2004, ASSESS ENV STATE EU
  • [6] Application of analytical hierarchy process to analyze stakeholders preferences for municipal solid waste management plans, Boston, USA
    Contreras, Francisco
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    Aramaki, Toshiya
    Connors, Stephen
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (07) : 979 - 991
  • [7] A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability
    Cucek, Lidija
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Kravanja, Zdravko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 34 : 9 - 20
  • [8] Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP
    De Feo, Giovanni
    De Gisi, Sabino
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (11) : 2370 - 2382
  • [9] Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management alternatives with consideration of uncertainty: SIWMS development and application
    El Hanandeh, Ali
    El-Zein, Abbas
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (05) : 902 - 911
  • [10] Fodor Z, 2012, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V90, P263, DOI [10.1016/j.psep.2012.04.002, 10.1016/j.psep.2011.09.004]