The economic value of water quality

被引:51
作者
Viscusi, W. Kip [1 ]
Huber, Joel [2 ]
Bell, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Law, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
water quality; stated preference; conjoint analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-007-9186-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stated preference values for water quality ratings based on the US Environmental Protection Agency National Water Quality Inventory ratings provide an operational basis for benefit assessment. Iterative choice survey results for a very large, nationally representative, Web-based panel imply an average valuation of $32 for each percent increase in lakes and rivers in the region for which water quality is rated "Good." Valuations are skewed, with the mean value more than double the median. Sources of heterogeneity in benefit values include differences in responses to average water quality information and the base level of water quality. Conjoint estimates are somewhat lower than the iterative choice values. The annual economic value of the decline in inland US water quality from 1994 to 2000 is over $20 billion.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 187
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   EXISTENCE VALUES IN BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS AND DAMAGE ASSESSMENT [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
WELSH, MP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1992, 68 (04) :405-417
[2]  
BISHOP RC, 1990, EC VALUATION NATURAL
[3]   STARTING POINT BIAS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION BIDDING GAMES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
BISHOP, RC ;
WELSH, MP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1985, 61 (02) :188-194
[4]   THE VALUE OF CLEAN WATER - THE PUBLICS WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR BOATABLE, FISHABLE, AND SWIMMABLE QUALITY WATER [J].
CARSON, RT ;
MITCHELL, RC .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (07) :2445-2454
[5]   Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats [J].
DeShazo, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (03) :360-385
[6]   Improving environmental valuation estimates through consistent use of revealed and stated preference information [J].
Eom, Young-Sook ;
Larson, Douglas M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 52 (01) :501-516
[7]  
Freeman III A.M., 2003, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[8]   An experimental testing of anchoring effects in discrete choice questions [J].
Frykblom, P ;
Shogren, JF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 16 (03) :329-341
[9]   Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation [J].
Heberlein, TA ;
Wilson, MA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Schaeffer, NC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) :1-22
[10]  
HUBER J, 2007, ORG BEHAV H IN PRESS