Seismic soil-pile-structure kinematic and inertial interaction-A new beam approach

被引:51
作者
Kampitsis, A. E. [1 ]
Sapountzakis, E. J. [1 ]
Giannakos, S. K. [1 ]
Gerolymos, N. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Civil Engn, GR-15780 Athens, Greece
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction; Kinematic-inertial interaction; BEM; FEM; 3-D solid models; Nonlinear dynamics; Large deflections; Timoshenko theory; Nonlinear Winkler; Two-layer soil; END-BEARING PILES; SINGLE PILES; LAYERED SOIL; DYNAMIC EXPERIMENTS; MOVING LOADS; FOUNDATIONS; MODEL; EXCITATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.023
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of an advanced beam model for the soil-pile-structure kinematic and inertial interaction and demonstrate its efficiency and advantages compared to other commonly used beam or solid models. Within this context, a Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation model is adopted based on the Boundary Element Method (BEM), accounting for the effects induced by geometrical nonlinearity, rotary inertia and shear deformation, employing the concept of shear deformation coefficients. The soil nonlinearity is taken into consideration by means of a hybrid spring configuration consisting of a nonlinear (p-y) spring connected in series to an elastic spring-damper model. The nonlinear spring captures the near-field plastification of the soil while the spring-damper system (Kelvin-Voigt element) represents the far-field viscoelastic character of the soil. An extensive case study is carried out on a pile-column-deck system of a bridge, found in two cohesive layers of sharply different stiffness and subjected to various earthquake excitations, providing insight to several phenomena. The results of the proposed model are compared with those obtained from a Beam-FE solution as well as from a rigorous fully three-dimensional (3-D) continuum FE scheme. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 224
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, EUROCODE 8 DESIGN ST
  • [2] [Anonymous], ABAQUS US MAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], SHAKE91 COMPUTER PRO
  • [4] Kinematic response of single piles for different boundary conditions: Analytical solutions and normalization schemes
    Anoyatis, George
    Di Laora, Raffaele
    Mandolini, Alessandro
    Mylonakis, George
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 44 : 183 - 195
  • [5] Dynamic analyses of plane frames by integral equations for bars and Timoshenko beams
    Antes, H
    Schanz, M
    Alvermann, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2004, 276 (3-5) : 807 - 836
  • [6] Bazant Z. P., 1991, Stability of structures: Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture and Damage Theories
  • [7] Blaney GW, 1989, GEOTECH TEST J, V10, P22
  • [8] Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses
    Boulanger, RW
    Curras, CJ
    Kutter, BL
    Wilson, DW
    Abghari, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (09) : 750 - 759
  • [9] Brenan K.E., 1989, Numerical Solution of Initial-Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, Algebraic Equations
  • [10] Dynamic response of laterally excited pile groups
    Burr, JP
    Pender, MJ
    Larkin, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (01) : 1 - 8