Key areas for conserving United States' biodiversity likely threatened by future land use change

被引:20
作者
Martinuzzi, S. [1 ]
Radeloff, V. C. [1 ]
Higgins, J. V. [2 ]
Helmers, D. P. [1 ]
Plantinga, A. J. [3 ]
Lewis, D. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Nature Conservancy, Global Freshwater Team, Chicago, IL 60603 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Univ Puget Sound, Dept Econ, Tacoma, WA 98416 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biodiversity conservation; habitat loss; land use/land cover change; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; PROTECTED AREAS; CONSERVATION; CONSEQUENCES; SCENARIOS; GROWTH; MANAGEMENT; EASEMENTS; SCIENCE; SPACE;
D O I
10.1890/ES12-00376.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A major challenge for biodiversity conservation is to mitigate the effects of future environmental change, such as land use, in important areas for biodiversity conservation. In the United States, recent conservation efforts by The Nature Conservancy and partners have identified and mapped the nation's Areas of Biodiversity Significance (ABS), representing the best remaining habitats for the full diversity of native species and ecosystems, and thus the most important and suitable areas for the conservation of native biodiversity. Our goal was to understand the potential consequences of future land use changes on the nation's ABS, and identify regions where ABS are likely to be threatened due to future land use expansion. For this, we used an econometric-based model to forecast land use changes between 2001 and 2051 across the conterminous U. S. under alternative scenarios of future land use change. Our model predicted a total of similar to 100,000 to 160,000 km(2) of natural habitats within ABS replaced by urban, crop and pasture expansion depending on the scenario (5% to 8% habitat loss across the conterminous U.S.), with some regions experiencing up to 30% habitat loss. The majority of the most threatened ABS were located in the Eastern half of the country. Results for our different scenarios were generally fairly consistent, but some regions exhibited notable difference from the baseline under specific policies and changes in commodity prices. Overall, our study suggests that key areas for conserving United States' biodiversity are likely threatened by future land use change, and efforts trying to preserve the ecological and conservation values of ABS will need to address the potential intensification of human land uses.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Anderson M. G., 2006, N ATLANTIC COAST ECO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
[3]   Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States [J].
Bengston, DN ;
Fletcher, JO ;
Nelson, KC .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 69 (2-3) :271-286
[4]   Consequences of changing biodiversity [J].
Chapin, FS ;
Zavaleta, ES ;
Eviner, VT ;
Naylor, RL ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Reynolds, HL ;
Hooper, DU ;
Lavorel, S ;
Sala, OE ;
Hobbie, SE ;
Mack, MC ;
Diaz, S .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :234-242
[5]   A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands [J].
Doremus, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (03) :217-232
[6]   Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 [J].
Ellis, Erle C. ;
Goldewijk, Kees Klein ;
Siebert, Stefan ;
Lightman, Deborah ;
Ramankutty, Navin .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2010, 19 (05) :589-606
[7]   Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity [J].
Fahrig, L .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2003, 34 :487-515
[8]   State-level variation in conservation investment by a major nongovernmental organization [J].
Fishburn, Isla S. ;
Kareiva, Peter ;
Gaston, Kevin J. ;
Evans, Karl L. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (02) :74-81
[9]   The Growth of Easements as a Conservation Tool [J].
Fishburn, Isla S. ;
Kareiva, Peter ;
Gaston, Kevin J. ;
Armsworth, Paul R. .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (03)
[10]   Top 40 Priorities for Science to Inform US Conservation and Management Policy [J].
Fleishman, Erica ;
Blockstein, David E. ;
Hall, John A. ;
Mascia, Michael B. ;
Rudd, Murray A. ;
Scott, J. Michael ;
Sutherland, William J. ;
Bartuska, Ann M. ;
Brown, A. Gordon ;
Christen, Catherine A. ;
Clement, Joel P. ;
DellaSala, Dominick ;
Duke, Clifford S. ;
Eaton, Marietta ;
Fiske, Shirley J. ;
Gosnell, Hannah ;
Haney, J. Christopher ;
Hutchins, Michael ;
Klein, Mary L. ;
Marqusee, Jeffrey ;
Noon, Barry R. ;
Nordgren, John R. ;
Orbuch, Paul M. ;
Powell, Jimmie ;
Quarles, Steven P. ;
Saterson, Kathryn A. ;
Savitt, Charles C. ;
Stein, Bruce A. ;
Webster, Michael S. ;
Vedder, Amy .
BIOSCIENCE, 2011, 61 (04) :290-300