Systematic review: Work-related stress and the HSE Management Standards

被引:55
作者
Brookes, K. [1 ]
Limbert, C. [1 ]
Deacy, C. [2 ]
O'Reilly, A. [2 ]
Scott, S. [2 ]
Thirlaway, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Metropolitan Univ, Dept Appl Psychol, Cardiff CF5 2YB, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Metropolitan Univ, Cardiff CF5 2YB, S Glam, Wales
来源
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD | 2013年 / 63卷 / 07期
关键词
HSE; indicator tool; management standards; systematic review; work-related stress; INDICATOR TOOL; UK HEALTH; INTERVENTIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/occmed/kqt078
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has defined six management standards representing aspects of work that, if poorly managed, are associated with lower levels of employee health and productivity, and increased sickness absence. The HSE indicator tool aims to measure organizations' performance in managing the primary stressors identified by the HSE management standards. Aims The aims of the study are to explore how the HSE indicator tool has been implemented within organizations and to identify contexts in which the tool has been used, its psychometric properties and relationships with alternative measures of well-being and stress. Methods Studies that matched specific criteria were included in the review. Abstracts were considered by two researchers to ensure a reliable process. Full texts were obtained when abstracts met the inclusion criteria. Results Thirteen papers were included in the review. Using factor analysis and measures of reliability, the studies suggest that the HSE indicator tool is a psychometrically sound measure. The tool has been used to measure work-related stress across different occupational groups, with a clear relationship between the HSE tool and alternative measures of well-being. Limitations of the tool and recommendations for future research are discussed. Conclusions The HSE indicator tool is a psychometrically sound measure of organizational performance against the HSE management standards. As such it can provide a broad overview of sources of work-related stress within organizations. More research is required to explore the use of the tool in the design of interventions to reduce stress, and its use in different contexts and with different cultural and gender groups.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 472
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PHYSICS, DOI DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVB.85.153301
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WORK RELATED STRESS
[3]   Psychosocial working conditions and work-related stressors among UK veterinary surgeons [J].
Bartram, David J. ;
Yadegarfar, Ghasem ;
Baldwin, David S. .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2009, 59 (05) :334-341
[4]   The Management Standards Indicator Tool and the estimation of risk [J].
Bevan, A. ;
Houdmont, J. ;
Menear, N. .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2010, 60 (07) :525-531
[5]   'Management Standards' work-related stress in the UK: Practical development [J].
Cousins, R ;
Mackay, CJ ;
Clarke, SD ;
Kelly, C ;
Kelly, PJ ;
McCaig, RH .
WORK AND STRESS, 2004, 18 (02) :113-136
[6]  
Cox T., 2000, RES WORK RELATED STR
[7]   Managing Workplace Stress: Psychosocial Hazard Risk Profiles in Public and Private Sector Australia [J].
D'Aleo, Nina ;
Stebbins, Peter ;
Lowe, Roger ;
Lees, Danielle ;
Ham, David .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION COUNSELLING, 2007, 13 (02) :68-87
[8]   Psychometric analysis of the UK health and Safety Executive's Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool [J].
Edwards, Julian A. ;
Webster, Simon ;
Van Laar, Darren ;
Easton, Simon .
WORK AND STRESS, 2008, 22 (02) :96-107
[9]   Psychosocial risk assessment: Measurement invariance of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool across public and private sector organizations [J].
Edwards, Julian A. ;
Webster, Simon .
WORK AND STRESS, 2012, 26 (02) :130-142
[10]  
George D., 2016, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, V14th