Low-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Without Visible Tumor (T1c) On Multiparametric MRI Could Qualify for Active Surveillance Candidate Even If They Did Not Meet Inclusion Criteria of Active Surveillance Protocol

被引:24
作者
Lee, Dong Hoon [1 ]
Koo, Kyo Chul [1 ]
Lee, Seung Hwan [1 ]
Rha, Koon Ho [1 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [1 ]
Hong, Sung Joon [1 ]
Chung, Byung Ha [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Urol Sci Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
low-risk prostate cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; active surveillance; INCREMENTAL VALUE; BIOPSY; MEN; PREDICTION; OUTCOMES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyt041
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We compared the pathologic outcomes of prostate cancer patients who did not qualify for active surveillance according to the tumor visibility on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. We retrospectively analyzed 464 prostate cancer patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before radical prostatectomy between 2006 and 2012. All the patients had clinically localized prostate cancer with Gleason score 6 and prostate-specific antigen 10 ng/ml. Of these patients, 238 were eligible for active surveillance (group A) and 226 were not. We divided these 226 patients into two groups according to the result of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: 59 (26.1) patients without visible tumor (group B) and 167 (73.9) patients with visible tumor (group C). We evaluated the pathologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason 6 disease and unfavorable disease in each group. The proportions of organ-confined Gleason 6 disease and unfavorable disease were 63.9 and 11.3 in group A, 59.3 and 10.2 in group B, and 38.9 and 22.8 in Group C. Comparing group A and B, these proportions were not statistically different (P 0.549 and P 1.000, respectively). However, comparing group A and C, those were significantly different (P 0.001 and P 0.002, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no visible tumor on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was an independent predictor of organ-confined Gleason score 6 disease (odds ratio 0.426, P 0.007) but there was no statistically independent predictor for unfavorable disease. The tumor visibility on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could be a predictor of favorable disease for the prostate cancer patients who did not meet active surveillance criteria. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could help to determine treatment modality for the low-risk prostate cancer patients who consider active surveillance even if they did not meet active surveillance criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 558
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Role of Prostate Specific Antigen and Immediate Confirmatory Biopsy in Predicting Progression During Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Adamy, Ari ;
Yee, David S. ;
Matsushita, Kazuhito ;
Maschino, Alexandra ;
Cronin, Angel ;
Vickers, Andrew ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Eastham, James A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (02) :477-482
[2]   Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: Risk assessment and treatment [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Broering, Jeannette M. ;
Kantoff, Philip W. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) :S14-S19
[3]   Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Hilton, Joan F. ;
Reese, Adam C. ;
Zaid, Harras B. ;
Porten, Sima P. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Meng, Maxwell V. ;
Greene, Kirsten L. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (02) :228-234
[4]   Multiparametric MRI is helpful to predict tumor focality, stage, and size in patients diagnosed with unilateral low-risk prostate cancer [J].
Delongchamps, N. B. ;
Beuvon, F. ;
Eiss, D. ;
Flam, T. ;
Muradyan, N. ;
Zerbib, M. ;
Peyromaure, M. ;
Cornud, F. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2011, 14 (03) :232-237
[5]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer [J].
deSouza, N. M. ;
Riches, S. F. ;
VanAs, N. J. ;
Morgan, V. A. ;
Ashley, S. A. ;
Fisher, C. ;
Payne, G. S. ;
Parker, C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (07) :774-782
[6]   Endorectal T2-weighted MRI does not differentiate between favorable and adverse pathologic features in men with prostate cancer who would qualify for active surveillance [J].
Guzzo, Thomas J. ;
Resnick, Matthew J. ;
Canter, Daniel J. ;
Bivalacqua, Trinity J. ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Bergey, Meredith R. ;
Magerfleisch, Laurie ;
Tomazewski, John E. ;
Wein, Alan J. ;
Malkowicz, S. Bruce .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (03) :301-305
[7]   Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer [J].
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Scheenen, Thomas ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :453-461
[8]   Pathologic Prostate Cancer Characteristics in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Contemporary Protocols [J].
Iremashvili, Viacheslav ;
Pelaez, Liset ;
Manoharan, Murugesan ;
Jorda, Merce ;
Rosenberg, Daniel L. ;
Soloway, Mark S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) :462-468
[9]   Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Klotz, Laurence ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Lam, Adam ;
Nam, Robert ;
Mamedov, Alexandre ;
Loblaw, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) :126-131
[10]   Comparison of Pathological Outcomes of Active Surveillance Candidates Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy Using Contemporary Protocols at a High-volume Korean Center [J].
Lee, Dong Hoon ;
Jung, Ha Bum ;
Lee, Seung Hwan ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Choi, Young Deuk ;
Hong, Sung Jun ;
Yang, Seung Choul ;
Chung, Byung Ha .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (11) :1079-1085