A model for the harmonisation of test results of different quantitative D-dimer methods

被引:54
作者
Meijer, P
Haverkate, F
Kluft, C
de Moerloose, P
Verbruggen, B
Spannagl, M
机构
[1] ECAT Fdn, NL-2301 CE Leiden, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Prevent & Hlth, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Acad Med Ctr St Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hosp Munich, Munich, Germany
[6] Instand, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
D-dimer; harmonisation; linear regression; commutability;
D O I
10.1160/TH05-01-0042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The numerical test results of different D-dimer assays vary widely. Because of the complexity of the analyte of target as well as the variability in specificity of different D-dimer assays, only harmonisation of the test results seems to be feasible. The use of a single conversion factor does not take into account for several methods the lack of commutability between test results and consensus values at different D-dimer levels. This is probably related to the mutually different response of methods to high and low levels. We therefore designed a harmonisation model based on the transformation of a method-specific regression line to a reference regression line. We used the data for the measurement of a set of plasma samples with different D-dimer levels by 353 different laboratories using 7 of the most frequently used quantitative D-dimer methods. For each method we calculated the method-specific consensus value for each sample. The overall median value was also estimated. Per method linear regression was applied throughout the method-specific consensus values using the amount of patient pooled plasma added to the different plasma samples as the independent variable. The line through the overall median values of all 7 methods was used as the reference line. Harmonisation between the methods was obtained by transformation of the method-specific regression line to the reference line. This harmonisation resulted in a reduction of the variability between the method-specific consensus values from about 75% to about 5.5%. Clinical validation of this concept had shown significant improvement of the test result comparability. We conclude that this model is a feasible approach in the harmonisation of D-dimer methods. If the harmonisation procedure is included in the calibration procedure by the manufacturers, customers will automatically obtain harmonised test results.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 572
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
de Maat MPM, 2000, SEMIN THROMB HEMOST, V26, P625
[2]  
Dempfle CE, 2001, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V85, P671
[3]  
Elias A, 1996, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V76, P518
[4]  
Freyburger G, 1998, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V79, P32
[5]   FIBRIN DEGRADATION PRODUCT (FNDP) ASSAYS - ANALYSIS OF STANDARDIZATION ISSUES AND TARGET ANTIGENS IN PLASMA [J].
GAFFNEY, PJ ;
EDGELL, T ;
CREIGHTONKEMPSFORD, LJ ;
WHEELER, S ;
TARELLI, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1995, 90 (01) :187-194
[6]   Comparison of six D-dimer methods in patients suspected of deep vein thrombosis [J].
Gosselin, RC ;
Owings, JT ;
Kehoe, J ;
Anderson, JT ;
Dwyre, DM ;
Jacoby, RC ;
Utter, G ;
Larkin, EC .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2003, 14 (06) :545-550
[7]   D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: A metaanalysis [J].
Heim, SW ;
Schectman, JM ;
Siadaty, MS ;
Philbrick, JT .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (07) :1136-1147
[8]   Rapid D-Dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism:: Current status and new developments [J].
Janssen, MCH ;
Wollersheim, H ;
Verbruggen, B ;
Nováková, IRO .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1998, 24 (04) :393-400
[9]  
KOOPMAN J, 1987, J LAB CLIN MED, V109, P75
[10]   Clinically significant differences in the International Normalized Ratio measured with reagents of different sensitivities [J].
Lind, SE ;
Pearce, LA ;
Feinberg, WM ;
Bovill, EG .
BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 1999, 10 (05) :215-227