Comparison of Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Techniques for Evaluation of Air Quality: A Case Study

被引:3
作者
Gautam, Hrishikesh Chandra [1 ]
Nagendra, S. M. Shiva [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Civil Engn, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND THE NEW DIRECTION IN SOFT-COMPUTING FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS | 2018年 / 361卷
关键词
WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-75408-6_47
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Urban air quality has degraded at an alarming rate due to rapid urbanisation and industrialization in megacities. Therefore, there is an urgent need to assess air quality and suggest risk mitigation measures. In this paper, air quality of Chennai city was evaluated using different Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation (FSE) techniques i.e. Fuzzy similarity method (FSM) and Simple fuzzy classification (SFC) and the results are compared with the National air quality index (NAQI). In the case of SFC weights for different pollutants were computed using Shannon's information entropy. Seasonal analysis of the criteria pollutants shows highest concentration during the winter season followed by pre-monsoon and summer season. The lowest concentration was observed during Monsoon in most cases. The FSE results are optimistic as compared to the NAQI due to aggregation of pollutant concentration as opposed to maximising function in NAQI which reconfirms the findings of earlier researchers. FSE can be used as a decision making tool to communicate the overall air quality to policy makers/end users (Public) in a simplified qualitative form.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 615
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Classification of air quality using fuzzy synthetic multiplication [J].
Abdullah, Lazim ;
Khalid, Noor Dalina .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 184 (11) :6957-6965
[2]  
Al-sharhan S, 2001, 10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, P1135, DOI 10.1109/FUZZ.2001.1008855
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ROMAI J
[4]   Identification of river water quality using the Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation approach [J].
Chang, NB ;
Chen, HW ;
Ning, SK .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 63 (03) :293-305
[5]   Comparison of the Revised Air Quality Index with the PSI and AQI indices [J].
Cheng, Wan-Li ;
Chen, Yu-Song ;
Zhang, Junfeng ;
Lyons, T. J. ;
Pai, Joy-Lynn ;
Chang, Shiang-Hung .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 382 (2-3) :191-198
[6]  
CPCB, 2011, Air Quality Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Study for Indian Cities
[7]   Air pollution in the last 50 years - From local to global [J].
Fenger, Jes .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 43 (01) :13-22
[8]   Fuzzy approaches to environmental decisions: application to air quality [J].
Fisher, BEA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2006, 9 (01) :22-31
[9]   Chennai, India [J].
Krishnamurthy, Rashmi ;
Desouza, Kevin C. .
CITIES, 2015, 42 :118-129
[10]   Assessment of urban air quality in Istanbul using fuzzy synthetic evaluation [J].
Onkal-Engin, G ;
Demir, I ;
Hiz, H .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (23) :3809-3815