The Role of Thinking in the Comforting Process: An Empirical Test of a Dual-Process Framework

被引:26
作者
Bodie, Graham D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
social support; listening; message reception; information processing; stress; SUPPORTIVE MESSAGES; MODEL; COMMUNICATION; MOTIVATION; RESPONSES; OUTCOMES; WORK;
D O I
10.1177/0093650211427030
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Using data from 192 undergraduates asked to imagine a stressful experience, this study finds support for two primary contentions of a dual-process theory of supportive message outcomes: (a) message content impacts anticipated affect improvement (AAI) when processing motivation is high but not when low and (b) processing extent mediates the relationship between verbal person centeredness (VPC) and AAI for highly motivated participants. In addition, the dual-process framework was used to forward a modified theory of conversationally induced reappraisals. In support of this model, positive emotion words and situation reappraisal mediated the VPC-AAI link only when recipients afforded close attention to message content. The discussion focuses on how the dual-process framework might assist in modifying theories of supportive communication in other ways.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 558
页数:26
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [21] Which Comforting Messages Really Work Best? A Different Perspective on Lemieux and Tighe's "Receiver Perspective''
    Burleson, Brant R.
    Samter, Wendy
    Jones, Susanne M.
    Kunkel, Adrianne
    Holmstrom, Amanda J.
    Mortenson, Steven T.
    MacGeorge, Erina L.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2005, 22 (02) : 87 - 100
  • [22] Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach
    Burleson, Brant R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2009, 26 (01) : 21 - 38
  • [23] Explaining Gender Differences in Responses to Supportive Messages: Two Tests of a Dual-Process Approach
    Burleson, Brant R.
    Hanasono, Lisa K.
    Bodie, Graham D.
    Holmstrom, Amanda J.
    Rack, Jessica J.
    Rosier, Jennifer Gill
    McCullough, Jennifer D.
    [J]. SEX ROLES, 2009, 61 (3-4) : 265 - 280
  • [24] Burleson Brant R., 1998, Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts, P245, DOI [10.1016/B978-012057770-5/50011-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-012057770-5/50011-4]
  • [25] Cacioppo J. T., 1981, COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT, P309
  • [27] Cohen S., 1984, Handbook of Psychology and Health, V4, P253
  • [28] Cunningham M.R., 2000, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, P272, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452220437.N20
  • [29] CONTEXTUAL DETERMINANTS OF THE PERCEIVED SUPPORTIVENESS OF HELPING BEHAVIORS
    CUTRONA, CE
    COHEN, BB
    IGRAM, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1990, 7 (04) : 553 - 562
  • [30] ATTENTION - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    DEUTSCH, JA
    DEUTSCH, D
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1963, 70 (01) : 80 - 90