Makespan minimization in online scheduling with machine eligibility

被引:34
作者
Lee, Kangbok [1 ]
Leung, Joseph Y. -T. [2 ]
Pinedo, Michael L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Business Sch, Dept Supply Chain Management & Mkt Sci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[2] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] NYU, Stern Sch Business, Dept Informat Operat & Management Sci, New York, NY 10012 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Parallel machine scheduling; Eligibility constraint; Tree-hierarchical and GoS processing sets; Interval and nested processing sets; Online and semi-online scheduling; Offline scheduling; Makespan; Competitive ratio; PARALLEL MACHINES; IDENTICAL MACHINES; SET; APPROXIMATION; ALGORITHMS; GRADE; COMPETITIVENESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-012-1271-6
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we provide a survey of online scheduling in parallel machine environments with machine eligibility constraints and the makespan as objective function. We first give a brief overview of the different parallel machine environments and then survey the various types of machine eligibility constraints, including tree-hierarchical processing sets, Grade of Service processing sets, interval processing sets, and nested processing sets. We furthermore describe the relationships between the various different types of processing sets. We proceed with describing two basic online scheduling paradigms, namely online over list and online over time. For each one of the two paradigms we survey all the results that have been recorded in the literature with regard to each type of machine eligibility constraints. We obtain also several extensions in various directions. In the concluding section we describe the most important open problems in this particular area.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 222
页数:34
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Online algorithms: a survey [J].
Albers, S .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2003, 97 (1-2) :3-26
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Handbook of Scheduling-Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203489802.CH15
[3]   THE COMPETITIVENESS OF ONLINE ASSIGNMENTS [J].
AZAR, Y ;
NAOR, J ;
ROM, R .
JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS, 1995, 18 (02) :221-237
[4]   On-line load balancing in a hierarchical server topology [J].
Bar-Noy, A ;
Freund, A ;
Naor, JS .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2001, 31 (02) :527-549
[5]   The hierarchical model for load balancing on two machines [J].
Chassid, Orion ;
Epstein, Leah .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 15 (04) :305-314
[6]   Scheduling on identical machines: How good is LPT in an on-line setting? [J].
Chen, B ;
Vestjens, APA .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1997, 21 (04) :165-169
[7]   Preemptive scheduling on a small number of hierarchical machines [J].
Dosa, Gyoergy ;
Epstein, Leah .
INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 206 (05) :602-619
[8]   Minimizing average flow-time : Upper and lower bounds [J].
Garg, Naveen ;
Kumar, Amit .
48TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, :603-613
[9]   Scheduling unit length jobs with parallel nested machine processing set restrictions [J].
Glass, CA ;
Mills, HR .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (03) :620-638
[10]  
Graham R. L., 1979, Discrete Optimisation, P287