The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience

被引:168
作者
Cleland, Kelly [1 ]
Zhu, Haoping [2 ]
Goldstuck, Norman [3 ]
Cheng, Linan [4 ]
Trussell, James [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Off Populat Res, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Minhang Cent Hosp, Shanghai 201100, Peoples R China
[3] Reprod Res S Africa, ZA-8005 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Shanghai Inst Planned Parenthood Res, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
关键词
emergency contraception; intrauterine device; unintended pregnancy; unprotected intercourse; contraception; POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTION; ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; POSTCOITAL IUD; PREGNANCY; WOMEN; LEVONORGESTREL; COMBINATION; MULTICENTER; INSERTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/des140
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been studied for use for emergency contraception for at least 35 years. IUDs are safe and highly effective for emergency contraception and regular contraception, and are extremely cost-effective as an ongoing method. The objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data to estimate the efficacy of IUDs for emergency contraception. The reference list for this study was generated from hand searching the reference lists of relevant articles and our own article archives, and electronic searches of several databases: Medline, Global Health, Clinicaltrials.gov, Popline, Wanfang Data (Chinese) and Weipu Data (Chinese). We included studies published in English or Chinese, with a defined population of women who presented for emergency contraception and were provided with an IUD, and in which the number of pregnancies was ascertained and loss to follow-up was clearly defined. Data from each article were abstracted independently by two reviewers. The 42 studies (of 274 retrieved) that met our inclusion criteria were conducted in six countries between 1979 and 2011 and included eight different types of IUD and 7034 women. The maximum timeframe from intercourse to insertion of the IUD ranged from 2 days to 10 or more days; the majority of insertions (74 of studies) occurred within 5 days of intercourse. The pregnancy rate (excluding one outlier study) was 0.09. IUDs are a highly effective method of contraception after unprotected intercourse. Because they are safe for the majority of women, highly effective and cost-effective when left in place as ongoing contraception, whenever clinically feasible IUDs should be included in the range of emergency contraception options offered to patients presenting after unprotected intercourse. This review is limited by the fact that the original studies did not provide sufficient data on the delay between intercourse and insertion of the IUD, parity, cycle day of intercourse or IUD type to allow analysis by any of these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2000
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Systematic Review of Postfertilization Effects and Potential for Embryo Formation and Loss during the Use of Intrauterine Devices [J].
Buskmiller, Cara ;
Harrison, Donna ;
Ruppersberger, Lester A. ;
Yeung, Patrick P., Jr. .
LINACRE QUARTERLY, 2020, 87 (01) :60-77
[43]   Efficacy of NSAIDs in reducing pain during intrauterine device Insertion: A systematic review [J].
Martingano, Isabella ;
Lakey, Emma ;
Raskin, David ;
Rowland, Kevin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 309 :219-225
[44]   Twelve-year experience of office-setting removal of lost intrauterine devices in place for more than 10 years [J].
Kasuga, Yoshifumi ;
Lin, Bao-Liang ;
Maki, Junko ;
Wang, Hongxin ;
Yoshimura, Takuma ;
Nagai, Yoshie ;
Nakada, Sakura .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2019, 24 (03) :206-208
[45]   Femilis (R) 60 Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System-A Review of 10 Years of Clinical Experience [J].
Wildemeersch, Dirk ;
Andrade, Amaury ;
Goldstuck, Norman .
CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 10
[46]   Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of the treatment of intrauterine pathologies with the mini-resectoscope: A systematic review [J].
Etrusco, Andrea ;
Lagana, Antonio Simone ;
Chiantera, Vito ;
Gerli, Sandro ;
Carugno, Jose ;
Sorrentino, Felice ;
Riemma, Gaetano ;
Vitagliano, Amerigo ;
Favilli, Alessandro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (02) :527-537
[47]   Ten Years of Experience in Contraception Options for Teenagers in a Family Planning Center in Thrace and Review of the Literature [J].
Tsikouras, Panagiotis ;
Deuteraiou, Dorelia ;
Bothou, Anastasia ;
Anthoulaki, Xanthi ;
Chalkidou, Anna ;
Chatzimichael, Eleftherios ;
Gaitatzi, Fotini ;
Manav, Bachar ;
Koukouli, Zacharoula ;
Zervoudis, Stefanos ;
Trypsianis, Grigorios ;
Galazios, George .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (02)
[48]   Why Pakistani Women Do Not Use Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Misconceptions [J].
Sajjad, Waseem ;
Ishaq, Khadija ;
Asghar, Sunaina .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
[49]   The Intimate Link: A Systematic Review of Highly Effective Reversible Contraception and Women's Sexual Experience [J].
Sanders, Jessica N. ;
Smith, Nicole K. ;
Higgins, Jenny A. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (04) :777-789
[50]   Acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after discontinuation of previous contraception: results of a French clinical study in women aged 35 to 45 years [J].
Dubuisson, JB ;
Mugnier, E .
CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 66 (02) :121-128