Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani

被引:19
作者
Connor, Stephen E. J. [1 ]
Holland, N. Julian [2 ,3 ]
Agger, Andreas [3 ]
Leong, Annabelle C. [3 ]
Varghese, Re Ajay [1 ]
Jiang, Dan [3 ]
O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald [3 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Radiol, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] St Thomas Hosp, Auditory Implantat Ctr, London, England
关键词
Cochlear implant; cochleostomy; round window; computed tomography; CT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEOSTOMY SITE; PLACEMENT; LOCALIZATION; ARRAY;
D O I
10.3109/00016489.2012.680493
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusions: The round window membrane (RWM)-intentioned approach is superior to the traditional bony cochleostomy (BC) approach in obtaining electrode placement within the scala tympani (ST). Objective: Cochlear implant outcome is influenced by several factors, including optimal placement and retention of the electrode array within the ST. The present study aimed to assess whether the RWM route is superior to a traditional BC for placement and retention of the electrode array in the ST. Methods: This was a prospective consecutive non-randomized comparison study. All patients were implanted with the Advanced Bionics 1J electrode array. The RWM approach (n = 32) was compared with a traditional BC group (n = 33). The outcome measure was the electrode position as judged within the scalar chambers at four points along the basal turn using postoperative computed tomography (CT). Results: When the mean position scores were compared, the RWM-intentioned group had significantly more electrodes directed towards the ST compartment than the BC group (p < 0.001). The RWM electrodes achieved 94% ST retention compared with 64% for the BC group (p < 0.05). All electrodes stayed in the ST in the RWM group, whereas in the BC group 9% crossed from the ST to the scala vestibuli.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 937
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation - fact or fantasy? [J].
Adunka, OF ;
Pillsbury, HC ;
Kiefer, J .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2006, 126 (05) :475-482
[2]   Scala tympani cochleostomy I: Results of a survey [J].
Adunka, Oliver F. ;
Buchman, Craig A. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (12) :2187-2194
[3]  
Aschendorff A, 2011, HNO, V59, P448, DOI 10.1007/s00106-011-2319-7
[4]   Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults [J].
Aschendorff, Antje ;
Kromeier, Jan ;
Klenzner, Thomas ;
Laszig, Roland .
EAR AND HEARING, 2007, 28 (02) :75S-79S
[5]  
Briggs R J, 2001, Cochlear Implants Int, V2, P135, DOI 10.1179/cim.2001.2.2.135
[6]   Cochleostomy site: Implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation [J].
Briggs, RJS ;
Tykocinski, M ;
Stidham, K ;
Roberson, JB .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2005, 125 (08) :870-876
[7]   Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes [J].
Finley, Charles C. ;
Holden, Timothy A. ;
Holden, Laura K. ;
Whiting, Bruce R. ;
Chole, Richard A. ;
Neely, Gail J. ;
Hullar, Timothy E. ;
Skinner, Margaret W. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (07) :920-928
[8]   Packing of the Cochleostomy Site Affects Auditory Nerve Response Thresholds in Precurved Off-Stylet Cochlear Implants [J].
Gordin, Arie ;
Papsin, Blake ;
Gordon, Karen .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) :204-209
[9]  
Lane JI, 2007, OTOL NEUROTOL, V28, P658
[10]   Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: A cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography [J].
Lane, John I. ;
Driscoll, Colin L. W. ;
Witte, Robert J. ;
Primak, Andrew ;
Lindell, Edward P. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (02) :191-194