Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth

被引:91
作者
Walker, Joy [1 ]
Tucker, Lue-Yen [2 ]
Goodney, Philip [3 ]
Candell, Leah [4 ]
Hua, Hong [5 ]
Okuhn, Steven [5 ]
Hill, Bradley [6 ]
Chang, Robert W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, East Bay Med Ctr, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Permanente Med Grp Inc, Div Vasc Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Permanente Med Grp Inc, Div Vasc Surg, Santa Clara, CA USA
[7] Permanente Med Grp Inc, Div Vasc Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
EUROSTAR EXPERIENCE; NATURAL-HISTORY; FOLLOW-UP; ENLARGEMENT; REGISTRY; RUPTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.389
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: There is considerable controversy about the significance and appropriate treatment of type II endoleaks (T2Ls) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We report our long-term experience with T2L management in a large multicenter registry. Methods: Between 2000 and 2010, 1736 patients underwent EVAR, and we recorded the incidence of T2L. Primary outcomes were mortality and aneurysm-related mortality (ARM). Secondary outcomes were change in aneurysm sac size, major adverse events, and reintervention. Results: During the follow-up (median of 32.2 months; interquartile range, 14.2-52.8 months), T2L was identified in 474 patients (27.3%). There were no late abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptures attributable to a T2L. Overall mortality (P = .47) and ARM (P = .26) did not differ between patients with and without T2L. Sac growth (median, 5 mm; interquartile range, 2-10 mm) was seen in 213 (44.9%) of the patients with T2L. Of these patients with a T2L and sac growth, 36 (16.9%) had an additional type of endoleak. Of all patients with T2L, 111 (23.4%) received reinterventions, including 39 patients who underwent multiple procedures; 74% of the reinterventions were performed in patients with sac growth. Reinterventions included lumbar embolization in 66 patients (59.5%), placement of additional stents in 48 (43.2%), open surgical revision in 14 (12.6%), and direct sac injection in 22 (19.8%). The reintervention was successful in 35 patients (31.5%). After patients with other types of endoleak were excluded, no difference in overall all-cause mortality (P = .57) or ARM (P = .09) was observed between patients with T2L-associated sac growth who underwent reintervention and those in whom T2L was left untreated. Conclusions: In our multicenter EVAR registry, overall all-cause mortality and ARM were unaffected by the presence of a T2L. Moreover, patients who were simply observed for T2L-associated sac growth had aneurysm-related outcomes similar to those in patients who underwent reintervention. Our future work will investigate the most cost-effective ways to select patients for intervention besides sac growth alone.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 561
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The relationship of preoperative thrombus load and location to the development of type II endoleak and sac regression
    AbuRahma, Ali F.
    Mousa, Albeir Y.
    Campbell, John E.
    Stone, Patrick A.
    Hass, Stephen M.
    Nanjundappa, Aravinda
    Dean, L. Scott
    Keiffer, Tammi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (06) : 1534 - 1541
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, VASCULAR NEWS IN JUN
  • [3] Outcomes of percutaneous endovascular intervention for type II endoleak with aneurysm expansion
    Aziz, Abdulhameed
    Menias, Christine O.
    Sanchez, Luis A.
    Picus, Daniel
    Saad, Nael
    Rubin, Brian G.
    Curci, John A.
    Geraghty, Patrick J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (05) : 1263 - 1267
  • [4] Early and delayed rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a 10-year multicenter registry DISCUSSION
    Starnes, Benjamin
    Candell, Leah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (05) : 1152 - 1153
  • [5] Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Chaikof, EL
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Harris, PL
    White, GH
    Zarins, CK
    Bernhard, VM
    Matsumura, JS
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Fillinger, MF
    Rutherford, RB
    Kent, KC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) : 1048 - 1060
  • [6] Choke E, 2004, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V45, P349
  • [7] Type II endoleak is an enigmatic and unpredictable marker of worse outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Cieri, Enrico
    De Rango, Paola
    Isernia, Giacomo
    Simonte, Gioele
    Ciucci, Andrea
    Parlani, Gianbattista
    Verzini, Fabio
    Cao, Piergiorgio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (04) : 930 - 937
  • [8] Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: Differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks
    Dias, NV
    Ivancev, K
    Malina, M
    Resch, T
    Lindblad, B
    Sonesson, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (06) : 1229 - 1235
  • [9] Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition
    El Batti, Salma
    Cochennec, Frederic
    Roudot-Thoraval, Francoise
    Becquemin, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (05) : 1291 - 1297
  • [10] Rupture of infra-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: A series from EUROSTAR registry
    Fransen, GAJ
    Vallabhaneni, SR
    van Marrewijk, CJ
    Laheij, RJF
    Harris, PL
    Buth, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (05) : 487 - 493