Psychophysical Laws and the Superorganism

被引:35
作者
Reina, Andreagiovanni [1 ]
Bose, Thomas [1 ]
Trianni, Vito [2 ]
Marshall, James A. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Comp Sci, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Italian Natl Res Council, ISTC, Rome, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING; NEST-SITE SELECTION; WEBERS LAW; ANT COLONIES; PIERONS LAW; FOLD-CHANGE; INFORMATION; TIME; INTENSITY; COGNITION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-22616-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Through theoretical analysis, we show how a superorganism may react to stimulus variations according to psychophysical laws observed in humans and other animals. We investigate an empirically-motivated honeybee house-hunting model, which describes a value-sensitive decision process over potential nest-sites, at the level of the colony. In this study, we show how colony decision time increases with the number of available nests, in agreement with the Hick-Hyman law of psychophysics, and decreases with mean nest quality, in agreement with Pieron's law. We also show that colony error rate depends on mean nest quality, and difference in quality, in agreement with Weber's law. Psychophysical laws, particularly Weber's law, have been found in diverse species, including unicellular organisms. Our theoretical results predict that superorganisms may also exhibit such behaviour, suggesting that these laws arise from fundamental mechanisms of information processing and decision-making. Finally, we propose a combined psychophysical law which unifies Hick-Hyman's law and Pieron's law, traditionally studied independently; this unified law makes predictions that can be empirically tested.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Psychophysics and the evolution of behavior [J].
Akre, Karin L. ;
Johnsen, Soenke .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (05) :291-300
[2]  
Arganda S, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P3651
[3]   Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice [J].
Bogacz, Rafal ;
Usher, Marius ;
Zhang, Jiaxiang ;
McClelland, James L. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 362 (1485) :1655-1670
[4]   Collective decision-making [J].
Bosel, Thomas ;
Reinal, Andreagiovanni ;
Marshall, James A. R. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2017, 16 :30-34
[5]   House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors [J].
Camazine, S ;
Visscher, PK ;
Finley, J ;
Vetter, RS .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 1999, 46 (04) :348-360
[6]   Collective cognition in animal groups [J].
Couzin, Iain D. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (01) :36-43
[7]   Weber's law in decision making: Integrating behavioral data in humans with a neurophysiological model [J].
Deco, Gustavo ;
Scarano, Leandro ;
Soto-Faraco, Salvador .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (42) :11192-11200
[8]  
Fechner G.T., 1948, Readings in the history of psychology, P206, DOI [10.1037/11304-026, DOI 10.1037/11304-026]
[9]  
Fechner GT, 1860, Elemente der psychophysik, V2
[10]   Speed-cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour [J].
Franks, N. R. ;
Richardson, T. O. ;
Stroeymeyt, N. ;
Kirby, R. W. ;
Amos, W. M. D. ;
Hogan, P. M. ;
Marshall, J. A. R. ;
Schlegel, T. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 85 (06) :1233-1244