Music-based Autism Diagnostics (MUSAD) - A newly developed diagnostic measure for adults with intellectual developmental disabilities suspected of autism

被引:20
作者
Bergmann, Thomas [1 ]
Sappok, Tanja [1 ]
Diefenbacher, Albert [1 ]
Dames, Sibylle [2 ]
Heinrich, Manuel [1 ]
Ziegler, Matthias [3 ]
Dziobek, Isabel [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Protestant Hosp Konigin Elisabeth Herzberge, D-10365 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Stat Joint Masters Program Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Fac Life Sci, Dept Psychol, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Berlin Sch Mind & Brain, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Autism; Diagnostics; Intellectual disability; Assessment; Music therapy; SOCIAL COMMUNICATION QUESTIONNAIRE; ABERRANT BEHAVIOR CHECKLIST; SPECTRUM DISORDERS; CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR; OBSERVATION SCHEDULE; OVERT AGGRESSION; FIT INDEXES; VALIDITY; CHILDREN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2015.05.011
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The MUSAD was developed as a diagnostic observational instrument in an interactional music framework. It is based on the ICD-10/DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and was designed to assess adults on a lower level of functioning, including individuals with severe language impairments. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed instrument. Methods: Calculations were based on a consecutive clinical sample of N = 76 adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) suspected of ASD. Objectivity, test-retest reliability, and construct validity were calculated and a confirmatory factor analysis was applied to verify a reduced and optimized test version. Results: The structural model showed a good fit, while internal consistency of the subscales was excellent (omega > .92). Item difficulties ranged between .04 <= pi <= .82 and item-total correlation from .21 to .85. Objectivity was assessed by comparing the scorings of two external raters based on a subsample of n = 12; interrater agreement was .71 (ICC 2, 1). Reliability was calculated for four test repetitions: the average ICC (3, 1) was .69. Convergent ASD measures correlated significantly with the MUSAD, while the discriminant Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) showed no significant overlap. Conclusion: Confirmation of factorial structure and acceptable psychometric properties suggest that the MUSAD is a promising new instrument for diagnosing ASD in adults with IDD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Akande Emmanuella, 2004, J Psychiatr Pract, V10, P190, DOI 10.1097/00131746-200405000-00009
[2]   Validity of the social communication questionnaire in assessing risk of autism in preschool children with developmental problems [J].
Allen, C. W. ;
Silove, N. ;
Williams, K. ;
Hutchins, P. .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2007, 37 (07) :1272-1278
[3]  
AMAN MG, 1985, AM J MENT DEF, V89, P485
[4]  
[Anonymous], MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MMWR SURVEILLANCE SU, V61
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PSYCHOMETRIKA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, FRAGEBOGEN SOZIALEN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, MICROANALYSIS METHOD
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Diagnostisches Interview fur Autismus-revidiert: ADI-R
[10]  
deutsche Fassung des Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) von Michael Rutter, Ann Le Couteur und Catherine Lord