Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability

被引:100
作者
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
Banks, Charles J. [1 ]
Heaven, Sonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Food waste; Card packaging; Cattle slurry; Ammonia; Specific methane production; CENTRALIZED BIOGAS PLANTS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; SLAUGHTERHOUSE WASTE; ACETATE OXIDATION; CATTLE SLURRY; MANURE; CODIGESTION; MITIGATION; AMMONIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.040
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Cattle slurry and card packaging were used to improve the operational stability of food waste digestion, with the aim of reducing digestate total ammoniacal nitrogen concentrations compared to food waste only. Use of cattle slurry could have major environmental benefits through reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with current management practices; whilst card packaging is closely linked to food waste and could be co-collected as a source segregated material. Both options increase the renewable energy potential whilst retaining organic matter and nutrients for soil replenishment. Co-digestion allowed higher organic loadings and gave a more stable process. A high ammonia inoculum acclimated more readily to cattle slurry than card packaging, probably through supplementation by trace elements and micro-organisms. Long-term operation at a 75-litre scale showed a characteristic pattern of volatile fatty acid accumulation in mono-digestion of food waste, and allowed performance parameters to be determined for the co-digestion substrates. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 178
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]  
Braun R., 2003, Potential of co-digestion. IEA Bioenergy. Task 37
[12]   Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure [J].
Callaghan, FJ ;
Wase, DAJ ;
Thayanithy, K ;
Forster, CF .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (01) :71-77
[13]   Impact of industrial sludge and cattle manure on anaerobic digestion of the OFMSW under mesophilic conditions [J].
Capela, I. ;
Rodrigues, A. ;
Silva, F. ;
Nadais, H. ;
Arroja, L. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (03) :245-251
[14]   Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry [J].
Clemens, J ;
Trimborn, M ;
Weiland, P ;
Amon, B .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) :171-177
[15]   Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste [J].
El-Mashad, Hamed M. ;
Zhang, Ruihong .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (11) :4021-4028
[16]   Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of co-digestion with manure [J].
Hartmann, H ;
Ahring, BK .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (08) :1543-1552
[17]   The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization [J].
Holm-Nielsen, J. B. ;
Al Seadi, T. ;
Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (22) :5478-5484
[18]   Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae [J].
Karakashev, Dimitar ;
Batstone, Damien J. ;
Trably, Eric ;
Angelidaki, Irini .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 72 (07) :5138-5141
[19]  
Lukehurst C. T., 2010, UTILISATION DIGESTAT
[20]   Reducing the environmental impact of methane emissions from dairy farms by anaerobic digestion of cattle waste [J].
Maranon, E. ;
Salter, A. M. ;
Castrillon, L. ;
Heaven, S. ;
Fernandez-Nava, Y. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (08) :1745-1751