Evaluation of the success rate and complications of conventional varicocelectomy: Do we need microscopic surgery really?

被引:3
作者
Ameli, Mojtaba [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, Milad [1 ]
Khajavi, Abdoljavad [1 ]
Nabizadeh, Mostafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Gonabad Univ Med Sci, Gonabad, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Varicocele; non-microscopic surgery; infertility; SUBINGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY; TERMS;
D O I
10.1177/0391560318758938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Varicocele is the most commonly curable cause of infertility in men. Varicocele is found in 15% of the total male population, 35% of men with primary infertility, and 75%-81% of men with secondary infertility. Generally, patients seek microscopic surgery via surfing the Internet, which is not an available option in all medical centers. The purpose of this study was to determine the success rate and complications of conventional varicocelectomy and to compare it with that of the microscopic method. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 88 patients with varicocele who underwent non-microscopic varicocele surgery in the 15th Khordad Hospital during 2013-2015 were evaluated by the census method. Results: The mean age of patients with varicocele was 27.30 years; 52 patients underwent bilateral varicocelectomy and 36 left varicocelectomy. Surgical complications of non-microscopic varicocelectomy in the studied patients included bleeding and hydrocele formation both in 0.7% and recurrence in 2.8%. Testicular atrophy was not observed in any case. Conclusion: The incidence of recurrence, hydrocele formation, atrophy, and bleeding in non-microscopic varicocelectomy, if done in accordance with its principles, is not more than the microscopic approach and therefore it could be recommended as a safe surgical treatment in centers where microscopic surgery is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 26
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Fode Mikkel, 2009, Ugeskr Laeger, V171, P3421
[2]   Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: Comparative study of complications and surgical outcome [J].
Ghanem, H ;
Anis, T ;
El-Nashar, A ;
Shamlou, R .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (05) :1005-1009
[3]   Outcomes of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With and Without the Assistance of Doppler Ultrasound: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Guo, Liqiang ;
Sun, Wendong ;
Shao, Guangfeng ;
Song, Hongbin ;
Ge, Nan ;
Zhao, Shengtian ;
Liu, Yuqiang ;
Zhang, Xiulin ;
Xiao, Zhiying ;
Yuan, Mingzhen .
UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (05) :922-928
[4]   Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: A microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach [J].
Hopps, CV ;
Lemer, ML ;
Schlegel, PN ;
Goldstein, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2366-2370
[5]   Results and complications of laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy [J].
Itoh, K ;
Suzuki, Y ;
Yazawa, H ;
Ichiyanagi, O ;
Miura, M ;
Sasagawa, I .
ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 2003, 49 (02) :107-110
[6]  
Kachrilas S, 2014, JSLS, V18, pe2014
[7]   Transient asynchronous testicular growth in adolescent males with a varicocele [J].
Kolon, Thomas F. ;
Clement, Michele R. ;
Cartwright, Lisa ;
Bellah, Richard ;
Carr, Michael C. ;
Canning, Rouglas A. ;
Snyder, Howard M., III .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (03) :1111-1114
[8]  
Mendez-Gallart Roberto, 2010, Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, V63, P532
[9]  
Shamsa A, 2009, UROL J, V6, P170
[10]   Comparison of Laparoscopic and Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy in terms of Postoperative Scrotal Pain [J].
Soylemez, Haluk ;
Penbegul, Necmettin ;
Atar, Murat ;
Bozkurt, Yasar ;
Sancaktutar, Ahmet Ali ;
Altunoluk, Bulent .
JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (02) :212-217