Nature's Experiments and Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences

被引:37
作者
Morgan, Mary S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
natural experiment; Nature's or Society's experiment; passive data; randomization; comparative cases;
D O I
10.1177/0048393113489100
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article explores the characteristics of research sites that scientists have called natural experiments to understand and develop usable distinctions for the social sciences between Nature's or Society's experiments and natural experiments. In this analysis, natural experiments emerge as the retro-fitting by social scientists of events that have happened in the social world into the traditional forms of field or randomized trial experiments. By contrast, Society's experiments figure as events in the world that happen in circumstances that are already sufficiently controlled to be open for direct analysis without reconstruction work.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 357
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Replaying life's tape (Stephen Gould) [J].
Beatty, John .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2006, 103 (07) :336-362
[2]  
Campbell Donald T, 1967, METHODOLOGY EPISTEMO, P243
[3]  
Cantril Hadley with Gaudet Hazel Herzog Herta, 1940, INVASION MARS
[4]  
CARD D, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P772
[5]  
Cartwright Nancy D, 2012, PHILOS SCI, V79, P973
[6]  
David Card, 1995, MYTH MEASUREMENT NEW
[7]  
David Ozonoff, 1987, SCI TECHNOL, V12, P70
[8]   Improving causal inference - Strengths and limitations of natural experiments [J].
Dunning, Thad .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2008, 61 (02) :282-293
[9]  
Jared Diamond, 2010, NATURAL EXPT HIST
[10]  
Jay Oldenbaugh, 2006, PHILOS SCI, V73, P720