Impacts of environmental regulation on firm productivity: evidence from China's Top 1000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program

被引:38
作者
Ai, Hongshan [1 ]
Hu, Yang [1 ]
Li, Ke [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Normal Univ, Minist Educ China, Key Lab High Performance Comp & Stochast Informat, Key Lab Appl Stat & Data Sci,Sch Math & Stat, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
湖南省自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Total factor productivity (TFP); environmental regulation; the Top 1000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program (T1000P); chemical firms; difference-in-differences (DID); INNOVATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2020.1815642
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Regulatory environmental policy is crucial for energy conservation and emission reduction. However, no consensus is available on its impact on enterprises' total factor productivity (TFP). This study took 6631 chemical enterprises as examples to investigate the impacts of the Top 1000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program (T1000P) on enterprises' productivity. The empirical results from the difference-in-differences method indicate that the T1000P hinders TFP improvement. Specifically, the TFP change rate of enterprises affected by the T1000P decreased by 0.9230% annually. Mechanism analysis shows that the impact of T1000P includes increasing business costs, and reducing the profits of regulated companies. By checking the 'compensation effect' and 'crowding out effect' of the T1000P on enterprises' technological progress, we prove that the T1000P had negative impacts on technological innovation and reduced the enterprises' productivity. Therefore, the environmental regulations should be implemented based on industry characteristics and develop differentiated strategies to avoid excessive interference with the enterprises' production decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 844
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[2]   A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ambec, S ;
Barla, P .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 75 (03) :355-360
[3]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[4]  
[Anonymous], MICROBIOLOGY, DOI [DOI 10.1257/jep.9.4.97, DOI 10.1099/00221287-144-4-915]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NOT ISS 1000 ENT EN
[6]   USING THE LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURE OF EARNINGS TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF TRAINING-PROGRAMS [J].
ASHENFELTER, O ;
CARD, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1985, 67 (04) :648-660
[7]   THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY - DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS [J].
BARBERA, AJ ;
MCCONNELL, VD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (01) :50-65
[8]  
Battese GE., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00158774
[9]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[10]   Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes ;
Zhang, Yifan .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 97 (02) :339-351