Modelling Financial Markets during Times of Extreme Volatility: Evidence from the GameStop Short Squeeze

被引:3
作者
Andreev, Boris [1 ]
Sermpinis, Georgios [2 ]
Stasinakis, Charalampos [2 ]
机构
[1] GfK Bulgaria, Data Engn Dept, 47A Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd,2nd Floor, Sofia 1124, Bulgaria
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Dept Accounting & Finance, Univ Ave,West Quadrangle,Gilbert Scott Bldg, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
retail trading; WallStreetBets; short squeeze; GameStop; machine learning; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/forecast4030035
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ever since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdowns to curb the spread of the virus have resulted in an increased interest of retail investors in the stock market, due to more free time, capital, and commission-free trading brokerages. This interest culminated in the January 2021 short squeeze wave, caused in no small part due to the coordinated trading moves of the r/WallStreetBets subreddit, which has rapidly grown in user base since the event. In this paper, we attempt to discover if coordinated trading by retail investors can make them a market moving force and attempt to identify proactive signals of such movements in the post activity of the forum, to be used as a part of a trading strategy. Data about the most mentioned stocks is collected, aggregated, combined with price data for the respective stock and analysed. Additionally, we utilise predictive modelling to be able to better classify trading signals. It is discovered that despite the considerable capital that retail investors can direct by coordinating their trading moves, additional factors, such as very high short interest, need to be present to achieve the volatility seen in the short squeeze wave. Furthermore, we find that autoregressive models are better suited to identifying signals correctly, with best results achieved by a Random Forest classifier. However, it became apparent that even the best performing model in our experimentation cannot make accurate predictions in extreme volatility, evidenced by the negative returns shown by conducted back-tests.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 673
页数:20
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Influential investors in online stock forums [J].
Ackert, Lucy F. ;
Jiang, Lei ;
Lee, Hoan Soo ;
Liu, Jie .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 45 :39-46
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, CITRON RES TWITTER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CONTRACT GOVERNANCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ReutersMarch 24
[5]  
Armantier O., 2021, UPDATE HOUSEHOLDS AR
[6]  
Avery C, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P724
[7]   Twitter mood predicts the stock market [J].
Bollen, Johan ;
Mao, Huina ;
Zeng, Xiaojun .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 2 (01) :1-8
[8]  
Boylston C., 2021, ARXIV
[9]  
Bradley D., 2021, Place your bets? The market consequences of investment advice on reddits wallstreetbets
[10]  
Buz T., 2021, ARXIV