Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?

被引:15
作者
Singh, N. [1 ]
Tripathi, R. [1 ]
Mala, Y. M. [1 ]
Dixit, R. [2 ]
Tyagi, S. [1 ]
Batra, A.
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi 110002, India
[2] Maulana Azad Med Coll, Dept Radiol, New Delhi 110002, India
关键词
MRI; scar thickness; trans-vaginal sonography; VBAC; LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT; ULTRASOUND; RISK;
D O I
10.3109/01443615.2013.823926
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate scar thickness in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section, by trans-vaginal sonography (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to correlate precision of radiologically-measured scar thickness with actual measurement of scar thickness. A total of 35 pregnant patients with previous caesarean section planned for elective caesarean section, were evaluated prospectively. Their scar thickness was measured by TVS and MRI on the day of elective repeat caesarean section. These measurements were correlated with each other and with scar thickness measured during elective repeat caesarean section by using a caliper. The correlation coefficients between scar thickness measured by TVS and MRI with peroperative evaluation with a caliper, were +0.72 and +0.59, respectively. The study concluded that as MRI is a costlier modality and TVS has better correlation coefficient with actual scar thickness, TVS can be considered to be the better modality for antenatal scar thickness measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 813
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
AP/MSNBC, 2010, C SECT RAT GLOB EP L
[2]   Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment [J].
Bujold, Emmanuel ;
Jastrow, Nicole ;
Simoneau, Jessica ;
Brunet, Suzanne ;
Gauthier, Robert J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (03) :320.e1-320.e6
[3]   Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery [J].
Cheung, VYT ;
Constantinescu, OC ;
Ahluwalia, BS .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (11) :1441-1447
[4]  
Ebrashy A, 2012, KASR AL AINI J OBSTE, V3, P1
[5]   ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF CESAREAN-SECTION SCARS DURING PREGNANCY [J].
FUKUDA, M ;
SHIMIZU, T ;
IHARA, Y ;
FUKUDA, K ;
NATSUYAMA, E ;
MOCHIZUKI, M .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1991, 248 (03) :129-138
[6]   COMPARING ULTRASOUND AND MRI OF SCARRED MYOMETRIUM [J].
HEBISCH, G ;
KIRKINEN, P ;
HALDEMANN, R ;
PAAKKOO, E ;
HUCH, A ;
HUCH, R .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 1994, 15 (03) :112-115
[7]   Sonographic Lower Uterine Segment Thickness and Risk of Uterine Scar Defect: A Systematic Review [J].
Jastrow, Nicole ;
Chaillet, Nils ;
Roberge, Stephanie ;
Morency, Anne-Maude ;
Lacasse, Yves ;
Bujold, Emmanuel .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2010, 32 (04) :321-327
[8]   Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery [J].
Kushtagi, Pralhad ;
Garepalli, Suneeta .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 283 (03) :455-459
[9]  
Lijoi D., 2006, EUR J RADIOL, V59, P133
[10]   Comparison of transabdominal versus transvaginal ultrasound to measure thickness of the lower uterine segment at term [J].
Marasinghe, Jeevan Prasanga ;
Senanayake, Hemantha ;
Randeniya, Cyril ;
Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka ;
Arambepola, Carukshi ;
Devlieger, Roland .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 107 (02) :140-142