Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India

被引:110
作者
Fan, Shenggen [1 ]
Gulati, Ashok [2 ]
Thorat, Sukhadeo [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[2] IFPRI New Delhi Off, New Delhi 110012, India
[3] UGC, New Delhi, India
关键词
rural poverty; agricultural growth; investment; subsidies; India;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00328.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article reviews the trends in government subsidies and investments in and for Indian agriculture; develops a conceptual framework and a model to assess the impact of various subsidies and investments on agricultural growth and poverty reduction; and presents reform options with regard to re-prioritizing government spending. Subsidies in credit, fertilizer, and irrigation have been crucial for small farmers to adopt new technologies particularly during the initial stage of the green revolution in the late 1960s and 1970s. But it is now investments in agricultural research, education, and rural roads that are the three most effective public spending items in promoting agricultural growth and reducing poverty.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 170
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
FAN S, 2004, INVESTMENT SUB UNPUB
[2]   Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India [J].
Fan, SG ;
Hazell, P ;
Thorat, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (04) :1038-1051
[3]  
*GOI, 2004, EC SURV
[4]  
*GOI, 2003, REP COMM CAP FORM AR
[5]  
*GOI, 2007, EC SURV
[6]  
Gulati A., 2002, 24 NAT BANK AGR RUR
[7]  
Gulati A., 2003, The Subsidy Syndrome in Indian Agriculture
[8]  
*REV BANK IND, VAR YEARS FIN STAT G
[9]  
WALTERS E, 2005, MARGINAL COST PUBLIC
[10]  
World Bank, 2008, World development report