ROC analysis in patient specific quality assurance

被引:53
作者
Carlone, Marco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cruje, Charmainne [1 ]
Rangel, Alejandra [1 ]
McCabe, Ryan [1 ]
Nielsen, Michelle [1 ]
MacPherson, Miller [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Trillium Hlth Partners, Dept Med Phys, Mississauga, ON L5M 2N1, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M5S 3S2, Canada
关键词
IMRT; quality assurance; ROC; sensitivity; specificity; OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; IMRT QA; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; PASSING RATES; ARC THERAPY; DIODE-ARRAY; ERRORS; MLC; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4795757
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This work investigates the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods inpatient specific IMRT quality assurance (QA) in order to determine unbiased methods to set threshold criteria for gamma-distance to agreement measurements. Methods: A group of 17 prostate plans was delivered as planned while a second group of 17 prostate plans was modified with the introduction of random multileaf collimator (MLC) position errors that are normally distributed with sigma similar to +/- 0.5, +/- 1.0, +/- 2.0, and +/- 3.0 mm (a total of 68 modified plans were created). All plans were evaluated using five different gamma-criteria. ROC methodology was applied by quantifying the fraction of modified plans reported as "fail" and unmodified plans reported as "pass." Results: gamma-based criteria were able to attain nearly 100% sensitivity/specificity in the detection of large random errors (sigma > 3 mm). Sensitivity and specificity decrease rapidly for all gamma-criteria as the size of error to be detected decreases below 2 mm. Predictive power is null with all criteria used in the detection of small MLC errors (sigma < 0.5 mm) Optimal threshold values were established by determining which criteria maximized sensitivity and specificity. For 3%/3 mm gamma-criteria, optimal threshold values range from 92% to 99%, whereas for 2%/2 mm, the range was from 77% to 94%. Conclusions: The optimal threshold values that were determined represent a maximized test sensitivity and specificity and are not subject to any user bias. When applied to the datasets that we studied, our results suggest the use of patient specific QA as a safety tool that can effectively prevent large errors (e.g., sigma > 3 mm) as opposed to a tool to improve the quality of IMRT delivery. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4795757]
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] An analysis of tolerance levels in IMRT quality assurance procedures
    Basran, Parminder S.
    Woo, Milton K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2300 - 2307
  • [2] Statistical process control for IMRT dosimetric verification
    Breen, Stephen L.
    Moseley, Douglas J.
    Zhang, Beibei
    Sharpe, Michael B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) : 4417 - 4425
  • [3] Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging as a predictive marker for tumor response in patients undergoing chemoradiation for postoperative recurrences of cervical cancer
    Chopra, Supriya
    Verma, Ashish
    Kundu, Sayan
    Engineer, Reena
    Medhi, Seema
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Gupta, Sudeep
    Shrivastava, Shyam K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 8 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [4] Dose variations with varying calculation grid size in head and neck IMRT
    Chung, Heeteak
    Jin, Hosang
    Palta, Jatinder
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Kim, Siyong
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (19) : 4841 - 4856
  • [5] Cowan G., 1998, STAT DATA ANAL
  • [6] DeLuca P.M., 2008, J ICRU, V8
  • [7] Ezzell G A, 2001, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V2, P138, DOI 10.1120/1.1386508
  • [8] IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Burmeister, Jay W.
    Dogan, Nesrin
    LoSasso, Thomas J.
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Molineu, Andrea
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Ramsey, Chester R.
    Salter, Bill J.
    Shi, Jie
    Xia, Ping
    Yue, Ning J.
    Xiao, Ying
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) : 5359 - 5373
  • [9] A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) : 839 - 843
  • [10] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36