A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation

被引：80

作者：

Matt, Paul-Amaury ^{[1
]}

Toni, Francesca ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Comp, London SW7 2AZ, England

来源：

LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS | 2008年 / 5293卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

argumentation (Dung 1995) is a theory of dialectic that allows us to formalise and study various notions of argument acceptability. We depart from this standard approach and formalise a measure of argument strength by applying the concept of value of a game, as defined in Game Theory (von Neumann 1928). The measure thus obtained satisfies a number of intuitively appealing properties that can be derived mathematically from the minimax theorem.

引用

页码：285 / 297

页数：13

共 30 条

[21] HOW TO REASON DEFEASIBLY [J].

POLLOCK, JL .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 57 (01) :1-42

[22] Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification [J].

Pollock, JL .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 133 (1-2) :233-282

[23] PROBABILISTIC HORN ABDUCTION AND BAYESIAN NETWORKS [J].

POOLE, D .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1993, 64 (01) :81-129

[24] Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation [J].

Prakken, H .

JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 15 (06) :1009-1040

[25]

Prakken H, 1997, J APPL NONCLASSICAL, V7, P25, DOI DOI 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900

[26]

RAHWAN I, 2008, 7 INT C AUT AG MULT, P1031

[27]

RIVERET R, 2008, 2 INT C COMP MOD ARG, P324

[28]

Torrance G W, 1989, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V5, P559

[29]

von Neumann J, 1928, MATH ANN, V100, P295

[30] Credulous and sceptical argument games for preferred semantics [J].

Vreeswijk, GAW ;

Prakken, H .

LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 1919 :239-253

← 1 2 3 →