Lifetime cost-effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after de novo renal transplantation

被引:18
作者
Earnshaw, Stephanie R. [1 ]
Graham, Christopher N. [1 ]
Irish, William D. [1 ]
Sato, Reiko [2 ]
Schnitzler, Mark A. [3 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] Wyeth Ayerst Res, Collegeville, PA USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2008年 / 19卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1681/ASN.2007040495
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
After renal transplantation, immunosuppressive regimens associated with high short-term survival rates are not necessarily associated with high long-term survival rates, suggesting that regimens may need to be optimized over time. Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen may maximize the likelihood of long-term graft and patient survival by minimizing CNI-associated nephrotoxicity. In this study, a lifetime Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of a sirolimus-based CNI withdrawl regimen (sirolimus plus steroids) with other common CNI-containing regimens in adult de novo renal transplantation patients. Long-term graft survival was estimated by renal function and data from published studies and the US transplant registry, including short- and long-term outcomes, utility weights, and health-state costs were incorporated. Drug costs were based on average daily consumption and wholesale acquisition costs. The model suggests that treatment with sirolimus plus steroids is more efficacious and less costly than regimens consisting of a CNI, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids; therefore, CNI withdrawal not only shows potential for long-term clinical benefits but also is expected to be cost-saving over a patient's life compared with the most commonly prescribed CNI-containing regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:1807 / 1816
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004 ANN REP TRANSPL
[2]  
[Anonymous], J AM SOC NEPHROLOGY
[3]   Multivariate analysis of antibody induction therapy and their associated outcomes in deceased donor transplants [J].
Bunnapradist, S ;
Takemoto, SK .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) :889-891
[4]   Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: Considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies [J].
Castro, MCR ;
Araujo, LMP ;
Nahas, WC ;
Arap, S ;
David-Neto, E ;
Ianhez, LE .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (04) :874-876
[5]  
CHURCHILL DN, 1987, CLIN INVEST MED, V10, P14
[6]   Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. II. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year [J].
Cianci, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Mattiazzi, A ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Nicolas, M ;
Ruiz, P ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (02) :252-258
[7]   Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: A prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporin [J].
Flechner, SM ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Modlin, C ;
Feng, JY ;
Krishnamurthi, V ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Savas, K ;
Cook, DJ ;
Novick, AC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (08) :1070-1076
[8]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus therapy with early cyclosporin withdrawal vs. long-term cyclosporin therapy in Australia [J].
Gordois, A ;
Nobes, M ;
Toohey, M ;
Russ, G .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 20 (04) :526-536
[10]   Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival [J].
Hariharan, S ;
McBride, MA ;
Cherikh, WS ;
Tolleris, CB ;
Bresnahan, BA ;
Johnson, CP .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 62 (01) :311-318