Impact and Costs of Incentives to Reduce Attrition in Online Trials: Two Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:90
作者
Khadjesari, Zarnie [1 ]
Murray, Elizabeth [1 ]
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria [2 ]
White, Ian R. [3 ]
McCambridge, Jim [4 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [3 ]
Wallace, Paul [1 ]
Godfrey, Christine [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, E Hlth Unit, London NW3 2PF, England
[2] MRC Gen Practice Res Framework, London, England
[3] Inst Publ Hlth, MRC Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Ctr Res Drugs & Hlth Behav, London WC1, England
[5] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ York, HYMS, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Nonresponse; attrition; Internet; alcohol drinking; randomized controlled trial; ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION; INTERVENTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; PARTICIPATION; RECRUITMENT; RELIABILITY; PROGRAM; WEIGHT; RATES; MAIL;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.1523
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Attrition from follow-up is a major methodological challenge in randomized trials. Incentives are known to improve response rates in cross-sectional postal and online surveys, yet few studies have investigated whether they can reduce attrition from follow-up in online trials, which are particularly vulnerable to low follow-up rates. Objectives: Our objective was to determine the impact of incentives on follow-up rates in an online trial. Methods: Two randomized controlled trials were embedded in a large online trial of a Web-based intervention to reduce alcohol consumption (the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial, DYD-RCT). Participants were those in the DYD pilot trial eligible for 3-month follow-up (study 1) and those eligible for 12-month follow-up in the DYD main trial (study 2). Participants in both studies were randomly allocated to receive an offer of an incentive or to receive no offer of an incentive. In study 1, participants in the incentive arm were randomly offered a 5 pound Amazon. co.uk gift voucher, a 5 pound charity donation to Cancer Research UK, or entry in a prize draw for 250 pound. In study 2, participants in the incentive arm were offered a 10 pound Amazon. co.uk gift voucher. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up questionnaires in the incentive arm(s) compared with the no incentive arm. Results: In study 1 (n = 1226), there was no significant difference in response rates between those participants offered an incentive (175/615, 29%) and those with no offer (162/611, 27%) (difference = 2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3% to 7%). There was no significant difference in response rates among the three different incentives offered. In study 2 (n = 2591), response rates were 9% higher in the group offered an incentive (476/1296, 37%) than in the group not offered an incentive (364/1295, 28%) (difference = 9%, 95% CI 5% to 12%, P < .001). The incremental cost per extra successful follow-up in the incentive arm was 110 pound in study 1 and 52 pound in study 2. Conclusion: Whereas an offer of a 10 pound Amazon. co.uk gift voucher can increase follow-up rates in online trials, an offer of a lower incentive may not. The marginal costs involved require careful consideration. Trial registration: ISRCTN31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5wgr5pl3s)
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment
    Alexander, Gwen L.
    Divine, George W.
    Couper, Mick P.
    McClure, Jennifer B.
    Stopponi, Melanie A.
    Fortman, Kristine K.
    Tolsma, Dennis D.
    Strecher, Victor J.
    Johnson, Christine Cole
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (05) : 382 - 388
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, INTERNET BRITAIN
  • [3] Babor TF., 1989, AUDIT ALCOHOL USE DI
  • [4] Recruitment and retention of an online sample for an HIV prevention intervention targeting men who have sex with men: the Smart Sex Quest Project
    Bull, SS
    Lloyd, L
    Rietmeijer, C
    McFarlane, M
    [J]. AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2004, 16 (08): : 931 - 943
  • [5] The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C) - An effective brief screening test for problem drinking
    Bush, K
    Kivlahan, DR
    McDonell, MB
    Fihn, SD
    Bradley, KA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (16) : 1789 - 1795
  • [6] Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial
    Canvin, Krysia
    Jacoby, Ann
    [J]. TRIALS, 2006, 7 (1)
  • [7] ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES - A METAANALYSIS
    CHURCH, AH
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1993, 57 (01) : 62 - 79
  • [8] Connell J., 2007, CORE 10 USER MANUAL
  • [9] *CONSORT, 2010, CONSORT TRANSP REP T
  • [10] Following up Nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: Randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone
    Couper, Mick P.
    Peytchev, Andy
    Strecher, Victor J.
    Rothert, Kendra
    Anderson, Julia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (02) : e16