The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia

被引:6
作者
Grosek, Stefan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kucan, Rok [4 ]
Groselj, Jon [5 ]
Orazem, Miha [6 ]
Groselj, Urh [7 ]
Erculj, Vanja [8 ,9 ]
Lajovic, Jaro [8 ]
Borovecki, Ana [10 ]
Ivanc, Blaz [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Paediat Surg & Intens Therapy, Div Surg, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Chair Paediat, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Perinatol, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Neonatol Sect, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[5] Univ Ljubljana, Theol Fac, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[6] Ljubljana Inst Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[7] UMC Ljubljana, Dept Paediat Endocrinol Diabet & Metab Dis, Univ Childrens Hosp, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[8] Rho Sigma Res & Stat, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[9] Univ Maribor, Fac Criminal Justice & Secur, Maribor, Slovenia
[10] Univ Zagreb, Andrija Stampar Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Zagreb, Croatia
[11] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Hlth Sci, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
MORAL DISTRESS; PHYSICIANS; COMMITTEES; NURSES; EXPERIENCES; VIEWPOINTS; RESOLUTION; HOSPITALS; SERVICES; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0235509
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. Aim The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objective was to identify the main types of ethical dilemmas encountered and how HCPs solve them. Subjects and methods We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study among HCPs in 14 Slovenian hospitals. A questionnaire was designed and validated by HCPs who were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Data collection took place between April 2015 and April 2016. Results The final sample size was n = 485 (385 or 79.4%, female). The response rates for HCPs working in secondary and tertiary level institutions were 45% and 51%, respectively. Three hundred and forty (70.4%) of 485 HCPs (very) frequently encountered ethical dilemmas. Frequent ethical dilemmas were waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations on the ward, preserving patients' dignity, and relations between HCPs and patients. Physicians and nurses working in secondary level institutions, compared to their colleagues working in tertiary level institutions, more frequently encountered ethical dilemmas with respect to preserving patients' dignity, protecting patients' information, and relations between HCPs and patients. In terms of solutions, all HCPs most frequently discussed ethical dilemmas with co-workers (colleagues), and with the head of the department. According to HCPs, the most important role of HECs is staff education, followed by improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. Conclusions Waiting periods for diagnostics and treatment and suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations are considered to be among the most important ethical issues by HCPs in Slovenian hospitals. The most important role of HECs is staff education, improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe [J].
Steinkamp N. ;
Gordijn B. ;
Borovecki A. ;
Gefenas E. ;
Glasa J. ;
Guerrier M. ;
Meulenbergs T. ;
Różyńska J. ;
Slowther A. .
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2007, 10 (4) :461-475
[42]   Learning by Doing. Training Health Care Professionals to Become Facilitator of Moral Case Deliberation [J].
Stolper, Margreet ;
Molewijk, Bert ;
Widdershoven, Guy .
HEC FORUM, 2015, 27 (01) :47-59
[43]   Health Care Ethics Consultation: An Update on Core Competencies and Emerging Standards from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities' Core Competencies Update Task Force [J].
Tarzian, Anita J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (02) :3-13
[44]  
Ten Have Henk., 2016, Global Bioethics: An Introduction
[45]  
The R Foundation, 2015, R PROJ STAT COMP VER
[46]  
Tishchenko P, 2011, BIOETHICS JOURNALISM
[47]  
UNESCO, 2005, GUID N 2 EST BIOETH
[48]  
UNESCO, 2005, GUID N 3 EST BIOETH
[49]  
UNESCO, 2005, GUID N 1 EST BIOETH
[50]  
White M, 2011, OCHSNER J, V11, P309