The management of public institutions and organizations assigned and authorized to provide public services are often criticized for being expensive, inappropriate, slow and unproductive. Performance, which can be defined as a job, task or action accomplished in compliance with a job definition, is an economic and liberal approach that can eliminate such criticisms. However, the viability of performance-based management, which seems more suitable for the private sector, to traditional public administration based on public interest varies according to institution, field of service and organizational structure. At first, this study will examine public performance management. Then, information about the survey conducted on 360-degree performance evaluation method employed for identifying individual performance criteria of sub-governors and governors will be presented.