Comparison of Different Fractionation Schedules Toward a Single Fraction in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Using 3-Dimensional Radiobiological Models

被引:15
作者
Mavroidis, Panayiotis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Milickovic, Natasa
Cruz, Wilbert F. [1 ]
Tselis, Nikolaos [4 ]
Karabis, Andreas [5 ]
Stathakis, Sotirios [1 ]
Papanikolaou, Nikos [1 ]
Zamboglou, Nikolaos [4 ]
Baltas, Dimos [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Strahlenklin, Offenbach, Germany
[5] Pi Med Ltd, Athens, Greece
[6] Univ Athens, Dept Phys, Nucl & Particle Phys Sect, GR-10679 Athens, Greece
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2014年 / 88卷 / 01期
关键词
RATE INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY; HDR-BRACHYTHERAPY; RESPONSE RELATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SPECIFICATION; ALGORITHM; DELIVERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.10.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of the present study was the investigation of different fractionation schemes to estimate their clinical impact. For this purpose, widely applied radiobiological models and dosimetric measures were used to associate their results with clinical findings. Methods and Materials: The dose distributions of 12 clinical high-dose-rate brachytherapy implants for prostate were evaluated in relation to different fractionation schemes. The fractionation schemes compared were: (1) 1 fraction of 20 Gy; (2) 2 fractions of 14 Gy; (3) 3 fractions of 11 Gy; and (4) 4 fractions of 9.5 Gy. The clinical effectiveness of the different fractionation schemes was estimated through the complication-free tumor control probability (P (+)), the biologically effective uniform dose, and the generalized equivalent uniform dose index. Results: For the different fractionation schemes, the tumor control probabilities were 98.5% in 1 x 20 Gy, 98.6% in 2 x 14 Gy, 97.5% in 3 x 11 Gy, and 97.8% in 4 x 9.5 Gy. The corresponding P+ values were 88.8% in 1 x 20 Gy, 83.9% in 2 x 14 Gy, 86.0% in 3 x 11 Gy, and 82.3% in 4 x 9.5 Gy. With use of the fractionation scheme 4 x 9.5 Gy as reference, the isoeffective schemes regarding tumor control for 1, 2, and 3 fractions were 1 x 19.68 Gy, 2 x 13.75 Gy, and 3 x 11.05 Gy. The optimum fractionation schemes for 1, 2, 3, and 4 fractions were 1 x 19.16 Gy with a P+ of 91.8%, 2 x 13.2 Gy with a P+ of 89.6%, 3 x 10.6 Gy with a P+ of 88.4%, and 4 x 9.02 Gy with a P+ of 86.9%. Conclusions: Among the fractionation schemes 1 (+) 20 Gy, 2 (+) 14 Gy, 3 x 11 Gy, and 4 x 9.5 Gy, the first scheme was more effective in terms of P+. After performance of a radiobiological optimization, it was shown that a single fraction of 19.2 to 19.7 Gy (average 19.5 Gy) should produce at least the same benefit as that given by the 4 x 9.5 Gy scheme, and it should reduce the expected total complication probability by approximately 40% to 55%. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 223
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A conformal index (COIN) to evaluate implant quality and dose specification in brachytherapy [J].
Baltas, D ;
Kolotas, C ;
Geramani, K ;
Mould, RF ;
Ioannidis, G ;
Kekchidi, M ;
Zamboglou, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (02) :515-524
[2]  
Baltas D, 2006, NEW TECHNOLOGIES RAD
[3]   HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY AS A MONOTHERAPY FOR FAVORABLE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER: A PHASE II TRIAL [J].
Barkati, Maroie ;
Williams, Scott G. ;
Foroudi, Farshad ;
Tai, Keen Hun ;
Chander, Sarat ;
van Dyk, Sylvia ;
See, Andrew ;
Duchesne, Gillian M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05) :1889-1896
[4]   HIGH-DOSE-RATE MONOTHERAPY: SAFE AND EFFECTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Demanes, D. Jeffrey ;
Martinez, Alvaro A. ;
Ghilezan, Michel ;
Hill, Dennis R. ;
Schour, Lionel ;
Brandt, David ;
Gustafson, Gary .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05) :1286-1292
[5]  
Emami B, 1991, J NUCL MED, V15, P109, DOI DOI 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y
[6]   High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy Delivered in Two Fractions Within One Day for Favorable/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Toxicity Data [J].
Ghilezan, Michel ;
Martinez, Alvaro ;
Gustason, Gary ;
Krauss, Daniel ;
Antonucci, J. Vito ;
Chen, Peter ;
Fontanesi, James ;
Wallace, Michelle ;
Ye, Hong ;
Casey, Alyse ;
Sebastian, Evelyn ;
Kim, Leonard ;
Limbacher, Amy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03) :927-932
[7]   A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: Feasibility study [J].
Giantsoudi, D. ;
Baltas, D. ;
Karabis, A. ;
Mavroidis, R. ;
Zamboglou, N. ;
Tselis, N. ;
Shi, C. ;
Papanikolaou, N. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (04)
[8]   High dose rate brachytherapy as prostate cancer monotherapy reduces toxicity compared to low dose rate palladium seeds [J].
Grills, IS ;
Martinez, AA ;
Hollander, M ;
Huang, RW ;
Goldman, K ;
Chen, PY ;
Gustafson, GS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (03) :1098-1104
[9]   Urethral strictures following high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Analysis of risk factors [J].
Hindson, Benjamin R. ;
Millar, Jeremy L. ;
Matheson, Bronwyn .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (01) :50-55
[10]   HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS AT MODERATE OR HIGH RISK OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE [J].
Hoskin, Peter ;
Rojas, Ana ;
Lowe, Gerry ;
Bryant, Linda ;
Ostler, Peter ;
Hughes, Rob ;
Milner, Jessica ;
Cladd, Helen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (04) :1376-1384