A quantitative comparison between C0 and C1 elements for solving the Cahn-Hilliard equation

被引:35
作者
Zhang, Liangzhe [1 ,2 ]
Tonks, Michael R. [1 ]
Gaston, Derek [1 ]
Peterson, John W. [1 ]
Andrs, David [1 ]
Millett, Paul C. [1 ]
Biner, Bulent S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Idaho Natl Lab, Fuels Modeling & Simulat Dept, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
[2] Stress Engn Serv Inc, Houston, TX 77041 USA
关键词
Cahn-Hilliard equation; FEM; Accuracy; Computational time; JFNK; ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; APPROXIMATION; SIMULATIONS; FRAMEWORK; ENERGY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The Cahn-Hilliard (CH) equation is a time-dependent fourth-order partial differential equation (PDE). When solving the CH equation via the finite element method (FEM), the domain is discretized by C-1-continuous basis functions or the equation is split into a pair of second-order PDEs, and discretized via C-0-continuous basis functions. In the current work, a quantitative comparison between C-1 Hermite and C-0 Lagrange elements is carried out using a continuous Galerkin FEM formulation. The different discretizations are evaluated using the method of manufactured solutions solved with Newton's method and Jacobian-Free Newton Krylov. It is found that the use of linear Lagrange elements provides the fastest computation time for a given number of elements, while the use of cubic Hermite elements provides the lowest error. The results offer a set of benchmarks to consider when choosing basis functions to solve the CH equation. In addition, an example of microstructure evolution demonstrates the different types of elements for a traditional phase-field model. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Finite element formulation of a phase field model based on the concept of generalized stresses [J].
Ammar, Kais ;
Appolaire, Benoit ;
Cailletaud, Georges ;
Feyel, Frederic ;
Forest, Samuel .
COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2009, 45 (03) :800-805
[2]  
Balay S, 1997, MODERN SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, P163
[3]   A multigrid method for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with obstacle potential [J].
Banas, L'ubomir ;
Nuernberg, Robert .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2009, 213 (02) :290-303
[4]   Finite element approximation of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with concentration dependent mobility [J].
Barrett, JW ;
Blowey, JF .
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 1999, 68 (226) :487-517
[5]  
Blowey J. F., 1991, Eur. J. Appl. Math., V2, P233, DOI DOI 10.1017/S095679250000053X
[6]  
Blowey JF., 1992, Euro. J. Appl. Math, V3, P147, DOI [10.1017/S0956792500000759, DOI 10.1017/S0956792500000759]
[7]   SPINODAL DECOMPOSITION IN CUBIC CRYSTALS [J].
CAHN, JW .
ACTA METALLURGICA, 1962, 10 (MAR) :179-+
[8]   FREE ENERGY OF A NONUNIFORM SYSTEM .1. INTERFACIAL FREE ENERGY [J].
CAHN, JW ;
HILLIARD, JE .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1958, 28 (02) :258-267
[9]   A nonstiff, adaptive mesh refinement-based method for the Cahn-Hilliard equation [J].
Ceniceros, Hector D. ;
Roma, Alexandre M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 225 (02) :1849-1862
[10]  
Chan P., 1995, COMP MATER SCI, V3, P377