Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?

被引:7
作者
Monteduro, Fabio [1 ]
Cecchetti, Ilenia [1 ]
Lai, Ylenia [1 ]
Allegrini, Veronica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
关键词
Stakeholder engagement; Corruption prevention; Risk management; Public sector; RESPONSIVENESS; PARTICIPATION; COLLABORATION; INVOLVEMENT; GOVERNANCE; RESOURCES; PRESSURES; CITIZENS; FIRM; MYTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Major international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), and the European Union (EU) have stressed the importance of risk management as a useful mechanism to prevent corruption. Anticorruption laws or regulations have been developed around the world, both at regional and national level. These aim to support the design and implementation of proactive management of corruption risks in the public sector. This article aimed to investigate the relationship between stakeholder engagement and the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We analysed the anticorruption plans of 343 Italian administrations to explore how different categories of stakeholders (i.e. employees, governing bodies, users/citizens associations) can contribute to the corruption risk management process. We found that the involvement of external and internal stakeholders can positively affect the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We explained our results by referring to both traditional organizational theories (institutional theory and the resource-based view) and public governance theories (collaborative and inclusive governance). Institutional pressures, knowledge and values emerged as keys to understanding the results.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 785
页数:27
相关论文
共 79 条
[71]   The changing nature of risk and risk management: The challenge of borders, uncertainty and resilience [J].
Smith, Denis ;
Fischbacher, Moira .
RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 11 (01) :1-12
[72]  
Transparency International, 2017, CORR PERC IND 2016
[73]   Preventing occupational corruption: utilising situational crime prevention techniques and theory to enhance organisational resilience [J].
Tunley, Martin ;
Button, Mark ;
Shepherd, David ;
Blackbourn, Dean .
SECURITY JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (01) :21-52
[74]   People power and anti-corruption; demystifying citizen-centred approaches [J].
Verdenicci, Serena ;
Hough, Dan .
CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 64 (01) :23-35
[75]   From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration [J].
Vigoda, E .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (05) :527-540
[76]   Comparing two designs when the new design has few or no failures - Is the new design better than previous one? [J].
Wang, WD ;
Langanke, DR .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2001 PROCEEDINGS, 2001, :322-325
[77]  
Webler T., 1999, J RISK RES, V2, P55, DOI DOI 10.1080/136698799376989
[78]   Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making [J].
Webler, Thomas ;
Tuler, Seth .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 41 (03) :503-518
[79]   Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality [J].
Yang, Kaifeng ;
Callahan, Kathe .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (02) :249-264