Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?

被引:7
作者
Monteduro, Fabio [1 ]
Cecchetti, Ilenia [1 ]
Lai, Ylenia [1 ]
Allegrini, Veronica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Management & Law, Rome, Italy
关键词
Stakeholder engagement; Corruption prevention; Risk management; Public sector; RESPONSIVENESS; PARTICIPATION; COLLABORATION; INVOLVEMENT; GOVERNANCE; RESOURCES; PRESSURES; CITIZENS; FIRM; MYTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-020-09527-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Major international organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United Nations (UN), and the European Union (EU) have stressed the importance of risk management as a useful mechanism to prevent corruption. Anticorruption laws or regulations have been developed around the world, both at regional and national level. These aim to support the design and implementation of proactive management of corruption risks in the public sector. This article aimed to investigate the relationship between stakeholder engagement and the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We analysed the anticorruption plans of 343 Italian administrations to explore how different categories of stakeholders (i.e. employees, governing bodies, users/citizens associations) can contribute to the corruption risk management process. We found that the involvement of external and internal stakeholders can positively affect the extent of implementation of corruption risk management systems by public organizations. We explained our results by referring to both traditional organizational theories (institutional theory and the resource-based view) and public governance theories (collaborative and inclusive governance). Institutional pressures, knowledge and values emerged as keys to understanding the results.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 785
页数:27
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Abed M.G.T., 2000, Corruption, structural reforms, and economic performance in the transition economies
[2]  
ANAC, 2015, RAPP STAT ATT QUAL P
[3]  
ANAC, 2018, RAPP STAT ATT QUAL P
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OECD INT REV IT REIN
[5]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[6]   Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector [J].
Ashworth, Rachel ;
Boyne, George ;
Delbridge, Rick .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2009, 19 (01) :165-187
[7]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[8]  
Beasley M.S., 2005, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, V24, P521, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JACCPUBPOL.2005.10.001
[9]  
Bogodistov Y, 2017, J RISK FINANC, V18, P234, DOI 10.1108/JRF-10-2016-0131
[10]   Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :27-+