Calculating uncertainties on predictions of palaeoprecipitation from the magnetic properties of soils

被引:18
作者
Heslop, David [1 ]
Roberts, Andrew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Earth Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
climofunction; discrimination intervals; palaeoprecipitation; pedogenesis; magnetic susceptibility; CHINESE LOESS PLATEAU; SUSCEPTIBILITY; RECORD; RECONSTRUCTIONS; DISCRIMINATION; PALEOSOLS; INTERVALS; PROXY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.11.013
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Quantitative predictions of past climate states based on calibrated proxy data are key to the reconstruction of palaeoenvironments and are essential for climate model validation. Magnetic climofunctions have been used to make predictions concerning past climates based on soil magnetic mineral assemblages. For example, detailed time series of Quaternary mean annual precipitation and palaeoprecipitation gradients across wide geographic regions have been predicted from the rock magnetic properties of Chinese loess and palaeosol units. Quantitative prediction requires full assessment of the uncertainties associated with predictions. However, little attention has been given to this important aspect of climofunction prediction. We present an analysis of an ensemble of published rock magnetic climofunctions and estimate the uncertainty of the associated predictions. We find that existing climofunctions have associated uncertainties that are so large that their subsequent predictions are effectively invalid. Thus, palaeoprecipitation reconstructions must be treated with extreme caution. In the future climofunctions that are constrained geologically through the inclusion of theoretical models of soil development may provide predictions with lower uncertainties. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 385
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Magnetic susceptibility as a proxy for rainfall: Worldwide data from tropical and temperate climate [J].
Balsam, William L. ;
Ellwood, Brooks B. ;
Ji, Junfeng ;
Williams, Earle R. ;
Long, Xiaoyong ;
El Hassani, Ahmed .
QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2011, 30 (19-20) :2732-2744
[2]   How abundant is pedogenic magnetite? Abundance and grain size estimates for loessic soils based on rock magnetic analyses [J].
Geiss, Christoph E. ;
Zanner, C. William .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2006, 111 (B12)
[3]   Direct estimates of pedogenic magnetite as a tool to reconstruct past climates from buried soils [J].
Geiss, Christoph E. ;
Egli, Ramon ;
Zanner, C. William .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2008, 113 (B11)
[4]   Lack of correlation between paleoprecipitation and magnetic susceptibility of Chinese loess/paleosol sequences [J].
Guo, B ;
Zhu, RX ;
Roberts, AP ;
Florindo, F .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (22) :4259-4262
[5]   THE MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF MODERN SOILS IN CHINA AND ITS USE FOR PALEOCLIMATE RECONSTRUCTION [J].
Han Jiamao ;
Lue Houyuan ;
Wu Naiqin ;
Guo Zhengtang .
STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 1996, 40 (03) :262-275
[6]  
Orgeira MJ, 2011, IAGA SPEC SOPRON, V1, P361, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0323-0_25
[7]   MAGNETIC STRATIGRAPHY OF CHINESE LOESS AS A RECORD OF NATURAL FIRES [J].
KLETETSCHKA, G ;
BANERJEE, SK .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (11) :1341-1343
[9]  
KUKLA G, 1988, GEOLOGY, V16, P811, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0811:PCICDB>2.3.CO
[10]  
2