Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort 1 osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA Part 2: Impaction surgery

被引:19
作者
Atac, M. S. [1 ]
Erkmen, E. [1 ]
Yucel, E. [1 ]
Kurt, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-06510 Emek, Turkey
[2] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
3D finite element analysis; Le Fort 1 osteotomy; Impaction surgery; Internal fixation; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; LEFORT-I OSTEOTOMY; ADVANCEMENT SURGERY; INTERNAL-FIXATION; STABILITY; SCREW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the second part of this Study was to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of 2- versus 4-plate fixation and bony structures after Le Fort I impaction surgeries using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Two 3D-FEA models were created to fixate the impacted maxilla at the Le Fort I level as 2-plate fixation at the piriform rims (IMP-2 model) and 4-plate fixation at the zygomatic buttresses and piriform rims (IMP-4 model). The IMP-2 model contained 225 664 elements and 48 754 nodes and the IMP-4 model consisted of 245 929 elements and 53 670 nodes. The stresses in each maxillary model were computed. The models were loaded on one side, at the molar-premolar region, in vertical, horizontal and oblique directions to reflect the chewing process. It was concluded that the use of 4-plate fixation following Le Fort I advancement Surgery provides fewer stress fields on the maxillary bones and fixation materials than 2-plate fixation from a mechanical point of view.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 63
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ARAJUO A, 1978, J ORAL SURG, V36, P849
[2]   Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA. Part 1: Advancement surgery [J].
Atac, M. S. ;
Erkmen, E. ;
Yucel, E. ;
Kurt, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (12) :1117-1124
[3]  
BELL WH, 1981, J ORAL SURG, V39, P666
[4]   STABILITY OF THE LEFORT-I ONE-PIECE MAXILLARY OSTEOTOMY [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
CHU, GW ;
JAKOBSEN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (03) :184-200
[5]  
Costa F, 1999, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V14, P207
[6]   STABILITY OF LEFORT-I OSTEOTOMY WITH MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT - A COMPARISON OF COMBINED WIRE FIXATION AND RIGID FIXATION [J].
EGBERT, M ;
HEPWORTH, B ;
MYALL, R ;
WEST, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (03) :243-248
[7]   Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis -: Part 1:: advancement surgery posterior loading [J].
Erkmen, E ;
Simsek, B ;
Yücel, E ;
Kurt, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (05) :551-558
[8]   Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy:: setback surgery-posterior loading [J].
Erkmen, E ;
Simsek, B ;
Yücel, E ;
Kurt, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 43 (02) :97-104
[9]  
GRAF H, 1974, HELV ODONTOL ACTA, V18, P7
[10]   A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques [J].
Haug, RH ;
Fattahi, TT ;
Goltz, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (10) :1199-1210